Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32986712›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2020

Mutation bias interacts with composition bias to influence adaptive evolution.

Alejandro V Cano, Joshua L Payne

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Emergence Biases in Molecular Evolution.Genome biology and evolution · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Module-Selection Balance in the Evolution of Modular Organisms.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Shifts in mutation spectra enhance access to beneficial mutations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  8. Transient mutation bias increases the predictability of evolution on an empirical genotype-phenotype landscape.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  9. Mutation bias and the predictability of evolution.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Mutation bias shapes the spectrum of adaptive substitutions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Towards an engineering theory of evolution.Nature communications · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alejandro V CanoInstitute of Integrative Biology, ETH, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4728-8489
Joshua L PayneInstitute of Integrative Biology, ETH, Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mutation is a biased stochastic process, with some types of mutations occurring more frequently than others. Previous work has used synthetic genotype-phenotype landscapes to study how such mutation bias affects adaptive evolution. Here, we consider 746 empirical genotype-phenotype landscapes, each of which describes the binding affinity of target DNA sequences to a transcription factor, to study the influence of mutation bias on adaptive evolution of increased binding affinity. By using empirical genotype-phenotype landscapes, we need to make only few assumptions about landscape topography and about the DNA sequences that each landscape contains. The latter is particularly important because the set of sequences that a landscape contains determines the types of mutations that can occur along a mutational path to an adaptive peak. That is, landscapes can exhibit a composition bias-a statistical enrichment of a particular type of mutation relative to a null expectation, throughout an entire landscape or along particular mutational paths-that is independent of any bias in the mutation process. Our results reveal the way in which composition bias interacts with biases in the mutation process under different population genetic conditions, and how such interaction impacts fundamental properties of adaptive evolution, such as its predictability, as well as the evolution of genetic diversity and mutational robustness.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularModels, GeneticMutationComputational BiologyDNA, BacterialGenotypePhenotypeProtein BindingTranscription FactorsDNA, BacterialTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID32986712
PMCPMC7571706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.