Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32986699›Full record

ReviewPLoS neglected tropical diseases2020

2020 Review and revision of the 2015 Darwin melioidosis treatment guideline; paradigm drift not shift.

Richard P Sullivan, Catherine S Marshall, Nicholas M Anstey, Linda Ward, Bart J Currie

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 89 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
89citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
11.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

89 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 149 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Characterization of an isogenicInfection and immunity · 2026
    Article
  10. Trigger Factor inJournal of bacteriology · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Genetic Engineering of Lysogenic-Lytic Switch Genes ImprovesInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

29 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Richard P SullivanGlobal and Tropical Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7176-1673
Catherine S MarshallDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Royal Darwin Hospital, Darwin, NT, Australia.
Nicholas M AnsteyGlobal and Tropical Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT, Australia.
Linda WardGlobal and Tropical Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT, Australia.
Bart J CurrieGlobal and Tropical Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT, Australia.
Charles Darwin University · AURoyal Darwin Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMelioidosis therapy is divided into an intravenous intensive phase and an oral eradication phase. The Darwin melioidosis treatment guideline has evolved over two decades, with over 1150 consecutive patients with culture-confirmed melioidosis managed under the Darwin Prospective Melioidosis Study. The current guideline, published in 2015, has been associated with low rates of recrudescence, relapse and mortality, and together with the treatment trials in Thailand, forms the basis for consensus global guidelines. We aimed to reassess the Darwin guideline and determine if any adjustments to the recommendations better reflect current practice in melioidosis therapy at Royal Darwin Hospital. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsThis retrospective cohort study reviews the characteristics, admission duration, duration of intravenous antibiotics, recrudescence, recurrence and mortality in all patients presenting with first episode culture-confirmed melioidosis in the tropical north of Australia's Northern Territory from 1st October 2012 until 1st January 2017. 234 patients were available for analysis. 16 (6.8%) died during the intensive phase treatment and 6 (2.6%) did not have complete treatment at Royal Darwin Hospital, leaving 212 patients for analysis. Six (2.8%) patients had recrudescence during therapy and 10 (4.7%) had recurrent melioidosis (relapse or new infection) after completion of therapy. Persisting osteomyelitis requiring surgery was an important reason for recrudescence as was unrecognized osteomyelitis for relapse. For patients presenting with an antibiotic duration determining focus of pneumonia, durations of intravenous antibiotics were often prolonged beyond the current 2-week minimum treatment recommendation. Prolongation of therapy in pneumonia mostly occurred in patients presenting with multi-lobar disease or with concurrent blood culture positivity. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The 2015 Darwin melioidosis guideline is working well with low rates of recrudescence, relapse and mortality. Based on the practice of the treating clinicians, the 2020 revision of the guideline has been adjusted to include a duration of a minimum of 3 weeks of intravenous antibiotics for those with concurrent bacteraemia and pneumonia involving only a single lobe and those with bilateral and unilateral multi-lobar pneumonias who do not have bacteraemia. We also extend to a minimum of 4 weeks intravenous therapy for those with concurrent bacteraemia and bilateral or unilateral multi-lobar pneumonia.

Indexed as

Selection, GeneticAdministration, IntravenousAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteremiaBurkholderia pseudomalleiFemaleGuidelines as TopicHumansMaleMelioidosisMiddle AgedNorthern TerritoryOsteomyelitisProspective StudiesRecurrenceAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID32986699
PMCPMC7544138
OpenAlexW3091461558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.