ReviewPLoS neglected tropical diseases2020
2020 Review and revision of the 2015 Darwin melioidosis treatment guideline; paradigm drift not shift.
Review in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 89 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
89 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 149 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neonatal patients with melioidosis: a systematic review.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy of drug treatment for severe melioidosis and eradication treatment of melioidosis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2023Pooled it
- Omitting the Eradication Phase of Treatment of Adults with Melioidosis: A Pilot, Single-Center Randomized Controlled Trial.Open forum infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Brought with the wind: A case of melioidosis acquired in the United States presenting with multiple pulmonary nodules.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026Article
- Outcomes of patients with suspected or confirmed melioidosis: A prospective multinational, multicenter, observational study.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026Observational
- Treatment of melioidosis in cats and dogs: antimicrobial therapy and clinical guidance for Burkholderia pseudomallei infections.Australian veterinary journal · 2026Article
- Evolutionary Convergence on a Dihydrofolate Reductase Mutation Drives Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole Resistance in Burkholderia thailandensis.ACS infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Article
- Characterization of an isogenicInfection and immunity · 2026Article
- Trigger Factor inJournal of bacteriology · 2026Article
- Melioidosis: diverse clinical manifestations and patient outcomes in a case series.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Review
- Neurological and Systemic Manifestations of Melioidosis: A Three-Case Series From Eastern India.Cureus · 2026Article
- Genetic Engineering of Lysogenic-Lytic Switch Genes ImprovesInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Whispers of decay: necrotic mediastinal lymphadenopathy due to melioidosis in a diabetic patient.Oxford medical case reports · 2026Article
- Disseminated melioidosis presenting with multifocal thoracic aortic mycotic aneurysms: A case report.World journal of clinical cases · 2026Article
- A 39-year-old man with high-grade fever, multiple cavitating lung nodules, and skin and liver lesions.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2026Article
- Phage-mediated control of melioidosis in Southern China: molecular insights and therapeutic potential of N4-like viruses from Hainan.BMC microbiology · 2025Article
- Thrice-weekly post-haemodialysis ceftazidime can achieve adequate pre-dialysis concentrations and clinical cure in patients with melioidosis.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2025Article
- Article
- The need for vigilance: melioidosis mimicking tuberculosis.ASM case reports · 2025Article
29 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMelioidosis therapy is divided into an intravenous intensive phase and an oral eradication phase. The Darwin melioidosis treatment guideline has evolved over two decades, with over 1150 consecutive patients with culture-confirmed melioidosis managed under the Darwin Prospective Melioidosis Study. The current guideline, published in 2015, has been associated with low rates of recrudescence, relapse and mortality, and together with the treatment trials in Thailand, forms the basis for consensus global guidelines. We aimed to reassess the Darwin guideline and determine if any adjustments to the recommendations better reflect current practice in melioidosis therapy at Royal Darwin Hospital. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
findingsThis retrospective cohort study reviews the characteristics, admission duration, duration of intravenous antibiotics, recrudescence, recurrence and mortality in all patients presenting with first episode culture-confirmed melioidosis in the tropical north of Australia's Northern Territory from 1st October 2012 until 1st January 2017. 234 patients were available for analysis. 16 (6.8%) died during the intensive phase treatment and 6 (2.6%) did not have complete treatment at Royal Darwin Hospital, leaving 212 patients for analysis. Six (2.8%) patients had recrudescence during therapy and 10 (4.7%) had recurrent melioidosis (relapse or new infection) after completion of therapy. Persisting osteomyelitis requiring surgery was an important reason for recrudescence as was unrecognized osteomyelitis for relapse. For patients presenting with an antibiotic duration determining focus of pneumonia, durations of intravenous antibiotics were often prolonged beyond the current 2-week minimum treatment recommendation. Prolongation of therapy in pneumonia mostly occurred in patients presenting with multi-lobar disease or with concurrent blood culture positivity. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The 2015 Darwin melioidosis guideline is working well with low rates of recrudescence, relapse and mortality. Based on the practice of the treating clinicians, the 2020 revision of the guideline has been adjusted to include a duration of a minimum of 3 weeks of intravenous antibiotics for those with concurrent bacteraemia and pneumonia involving only a single lobe and those with bilateral and unilateral multi-lobar pneumonias who do not have bacteraemia. We also extend to a minimum of 4 weeks intravenous therapy for those with concurrent bacteraemia and bilateral or unilateral multi-lobar pneumonia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.