ArticlePLoS computational biology2020
A simple, scalable approach to building a cross-platform transcriptome atlas.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluating Cross-Platform Batch Correction Methods for Integrated Microarray and RNA-seq Data Analysis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Article
- Trophic and temporal dynamics of macrophage biology in human inner ear organogenesis.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- TempO-seq and RNA-seq gene expression levels are highly correlated for most genes: A comparison using 39 human cell lines.PloS one · 2025Article
- Normalization and Selecting Non-Differentially Expressed Genes Improve Machine Learning Modelling of Cross-Platform Transcriptomic Data.Transactions on artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- PhosCancer: A comprehensive database for investigating protein phosphorylation in human cancer.iScience · 2024Article
- Comparison of iPSC-derived human intestinal epithelial cells with Caco-2 cells and human in vivo data after exposure to Lactiplantibacillus plantarum WCFS1.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Gene signatures for cancer research: A 25-year retrospective and future avenues.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Stemformatics data portal enables transcriptional benchmarking of lab-derived myeloid cells.Stem cell reports · 2024Article
- Functional Integrative Bayesian Analysis of High-dimensional Multiplatform Clinicogenomic Data.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2024Article
- Systematic comparison of transcriptomes of Caco-2 cells cultured under different cellular and physiological conditions.Archives of toxicology · 2023Article
- BaySyn: Bayesian Evidence Synthesis for Multi-system Multiomic Integration.Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing · 2023Article
- The Human Dendritic Cell Atlas: An Integrated Transcriptional Tool to Study Human Dendritic Cell Biology.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2022Article
- Sincast: a computational framework to predict cell identities in single-cell transcriptomes using bulk atlases as references.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Rank-in: enabling integrative analysis across microarray and RNA-seq for cancer.Nucleic acids research · 2021Article
- An integrated analysis of human myeloid cells identifies gaps in in vitro models of in vivo biology.Stem cell reports · 2021Article
- Forecasting cellular states: from descriptive to predictive biology via single-cell multiomics.Current opinion in systems biology · 2021Article
- An Unbiased Machine Learning Exploration Reveals Gene Sets Predictive of Allograft Tolerance After Kidney Transplantation.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gene expression atlases have transformed our understanding of the development, composition and function of human tissues. New technologies promise improved cellular or molecular resolution, and have led to the identification of new cell types, or better defined cell states. But as new technologies emerge, information derived on old platforms becomes obsolete. We demonstrate that it is possible to combine a large number of different profiling experiments summarised from dozens of laboratories and representing hundreds of donors, to create an integrated molecular map of human tissue. As an example, we combine 850 samples from 38 platforms to build an integrated atlas of human blood cells. We achieve robust and unbiased cell type clustering using a variance partitioning method, selecting genes with low platform bias relative to biological variation. Other than an initial rescaling, no other transformation to the primary data is applied through batch correction or renormalisation. Additional data, including single-cell datasets, can be projected for comparison, classification and annotation. The resulting atlas provides a multi-scaled approach to visualise and analyse the relationships between sets of genes and blood cell lineages, including the maturation and activation of leukocytes in vivo and in vitro. In allowing for data integration across hundreds of studies, we address a key reproduciblity challenge which is faced by any new technology. This allows us to draw on the deep phenotypes and functional annotations that accompany traditional profiling methods, and provide important context to the high cellular resolution of single cell profiling. Here, we have implemented the blood atlas in the open access Stemformatics.org platform, drawing on its extensive collection of curated transcriptome data. The method is simple, scalable and amenable for rapid deployment in other biological systems or computational workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.