Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32986694›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2020

A simple, scalable approach to building a cross-platform transcriptome atlas.

Paul W Angel, Nadia Rajab, Yidi Deng, Chris M Pacheco, Tyrone Chen, Kim-Anh Lê Cao, Jarny Choi, Christine A Wells

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Genome biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. BaySyn: Bayesian Evidence Synthesis for Multi-system Multiomic Integration.Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Paul W AngelCentre for Stem Cell Systems, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0478-0847
Nadia RajabCentre for Stem Cell Systems, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7253-4819
Yidi DengMelbourne Integrative Genomics, School of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Chris M PachecoCentre for Stem Cell Systems, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2980-3048
Tyrone ChenCentre for Stem Cell Systems, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9207-0385
Kim-Anh Lê CaoMelbourne Integrative Genomics, School of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3923-1116
Jarny ChoiCentre for Stem Cell Systems, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7788-8867
Christine A WellsCentre for Stem Cell Systems, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3133-3628
The University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene expression atlases have transformed our understanding of the development, composition and function of human tissues. New technologies promise improved cellular or molecular resolution, and have led to the identification of new cell types, or better defined cell states. But as new technologies emerge, information derived on old platforms becomes obsolete. We demonstrate that it is possible to combine a large number of different profiling experiments summarised from dozens of laboratories and representing hundreds of donors, to create an integrated molecular map of human tissue. As an example, we combine 850 samples from 38 platforms to build an integrated atlas of human blood cells. We achieve robust and unbiased cell type clustering using a variance partitioning method, selecting genes with low platform bias relative to biological variation. Other than an initial rescaling, no other transformation to the primary data is applied through batch correction or renormalisation. Additional data, including single-cell datasets, can be projected for comparison, classification and annotation. The resulting atlas provides a multi-scaled approach to visualise and analyse the relationships between sets of genes and blood cell lineages, including the maturation and activation of leukocytes in vivo and in vitro. In allowing for data integration across hundreds of studies, we address a key reproduciblity challenge which is faced by any new technology. This allows us to draw on the deep phenotypes and functional annotations that accompany traditional profiling methods, and provide important context to the high cellular resolution of single cell profiling. Here, we have implemented the blood atlas in the open access Stemformatics.org platform, drawing on its extensive collection of curated transcriptome data. The method is simple, scalable and amenable for rapid deployment in other biological systems or computational workflows.

Indexed as

TranscriptomeCluster AnalysisData CurationGene Expression ProfilingHumans

Identifiers

PMID32986694
PMCPMC7544119
OpenAlexW3090976229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.