Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32986584›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of spine surgery2020

An Evidence-Based Algorithm for Determining Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis After Degenerative Spinal Surgery.

Joshua A Shapiro, Matthew R Stillwagon, Alexander G Padovano, Stephan Moll, Moe R Lim

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of spine surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joshua A ShapiroUniversity of North Carolina, Department of Orthopaedics, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Matthew R StillwagonUniversity of North Carolina, Department of Orthopaedics, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Alexander G PadovanoUniversity of North Carolina, Department of Orthopaedics, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Stephan MollUniversity of North Carolina, Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Moe R LimUniversity of North Carolina, Department of Orthopaedics, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a potentially serious and life-threatening complication, there is no widely accepted protocol to guide VTE prophylaxis in adult degenerative spinal surgery, and pharmacologic overtreatment may result in hemorrhagic complications. Previously, we published the VTE Prophylaxis Risk/Benefit Score, an evidence-based algorithm that balances the risk and consequences of thrombotic versus hemorrhagic complications by taking consideration of patient-related risks, procedure-related risks, and the risk of neurological compromise to guide VTE prophylaxis. To objective of this study was to validate the VTE Prophylaxis Risk/Benefit Score.

methodsFrom January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2017, VTE Prophylaxis Risk/Benefit Scores and corresponding prophylaxes were prospectively assigned. When indicated, chemoprophylaxis was dosed 24 to 36 hours postoperatively to allow for adequate surgical hemostasis. Patients were retrospectively evaluated for immediate and short-term complications. The Fisher exact test compared incidence of complications by VTE prophylaxis. Multinomial logistic regression modeled the probability of complication by prophylaxis type, demographics, and comorbidities. Significance was set at

resultsOf the 266 patients who met inclusion criteria, 79.3% were given mechanical prophylaxis alone and 20.7% were given combined mechanical and chemical prophylaxis. Complications including VTE (0.38%), delayed wound healing or infection (2.26%), and hematoma (0.75%) were observed at rates similar to or lower than previously published studies with increased utilization of chemoprophylaxis. Use of chemoprophylaxis and continuation of perioperative aspirin were significantly associated with the development of a hemorrhagic complication. No patient developed persistent neurologic deficit from hematoma or pulmonary embolism.

conclusionsThe VTE Prophylaxis Risk/Benefit Score comprehensively considers the risk of thrombotic, wound, and bleeding complications and is an effective tool for determining appropriate thromboprophylaxis in adult degenerative spinal surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Indexed as

algorithmchemical thromboprophylaxisdeep infection ratehemorrhagic complication ratemechanical thromboprophylaxisrisk-benefitvenous thromboembolismwound complication rate

Identifiers

PMID32986584
PMCPMC7478019
OpenAlexW3046632020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.