Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32986441›Full record

ArticleNano letters2020

Testing of Commercial Masks and Respirators and Cotton Mask Insert Materials using SARS-CoV-2 Virion-Sized Particulates: Comparison of Ideal Aerosol Filtration Efficiency versus Fitted Filtration Efficiency.

W Cary Hill, Matthew S Hull, Robert I MacCuspie

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nano letters, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A Review of Filtration Performance of Protective Masks.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Masks for COVID-19.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022
    Review
  19. An upper bound on one-to-one exposure to infectious human respiratory particles.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

W Cary HillNanoSafe, Inc., 1800 Kraft Drive, Suite 107, Blacksburg, Virginia 24060, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3635-0294
Matthew S HullNanoSafe, Inc., 1800 Kraft Drive, Suite 107, Blacksburg, Virginia 24060, United States.
Robert I MacCuspieNanoSafe, Inc., 1800 Kraft Drive, Suite 107, Blacksburg, Virginia 24060, United States.
Virginia Tech · US

Funding

NanoSafe Tested™ Third Party Verification Process for Characterizing Exposures to Products Containing Engineered NanomaterialsR43ES030650 · NIEHS · NANOSAFE, INC. · PI HILL, WILLIAM CARY · 2019 to 2019
$150k
NIEHS NIH HHS R43 ES030650
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Shortages in the availability of personal protective face masks during the COVID-19 pandemic required many to fabricate masks and filter inserts from available materials. While the base filtration efficiency of a material is of primary importance when a perfect seal is possible, ideal fit is not likely to be achieved by the average person preparing to enter a public space or even a healthcare worker without fit-testing before each shift. Our findings suggest that parameters including permeability and pliability can play a strong role in the filtration efficiency of a mask fabricated with various filter media, and that the filtration efficiency of loosely fitting masks/respirators against ultrafine particulates can drop by more than 60% when worn compared to the ideal filtration efficiency of the base material. Further, a test method using SARS-CoV-2 virion-sized silica nanoaerosols is demonstrated to assess the filtration efficiency against nanoparticulates that follow air currents associated with mask leakage.

Indexed as

BetacoronavirusMasksRespiratory Protective DevicesTextilesAerosolsAir MicrobiologyCoronavirus InfectionsCotton FiberCOVID-19FiltrationHumansInhalation ExposureNanoparticlesPandemicsParticle SizePermeabilityAerosolsSilicon DioxideaerosolCOVID-19exposure testingface maskfiltrationmask fit

Identifiers

PMID32986441
PMCPMC7534799
OpenAlexW3088882798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.