Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32986309›Full record

ArticleThoracic cancer2020

Prognostic factors for survival in patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma: An analysis of the SEER database.

Begoña Campos-Balea, Javier de Castro Carpeño, Bartomeu Massutí, David Vicente-Baz, Diego Pérez Parente, Pedro Ruiz-Gracia, Leonardo Crama, Manuel Cobo Dols

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Thoracic cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Begoña Campos-BaleaOncology, Hospital Universitario Lucus Augusti (HULA), Lugo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8927-9129
Javier de Castro CarpeñoOncology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
Bartomeu MassutíOncology, Hospital Universitario Alicante (ISABIAL), Alicante, Spain.
David Vicente-BazOncology, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Seville, Spain.
Diego Pérez ParenteLung Cancer. Medical Affairs Department, Roche Farma S.A, Madrid, Spain.
Pedro Ruiz-GraciaLung Cancer. Medical Affairs Department, Roche Farma S.A, Madrid, Spain.
Leonardo CramaLung Cancer. Medical Affairs Department, Roche Farma S.A, Madrid, Spain.
Manuel Cobo DolsMedical Oncology, Unidad de Gestión Clínica Intercentros de Oncología Médica. Hospitales Universitarios Regional y Virgen de la Victoria. IBIMA, Málaga, Spain.

Funding

Roche Farma S.A. N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLung adenocarcinoma (ADC) is the main cause of death related to lung cancer. The aim of this study was to identify poor prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) in patients with stage IV lung ADC in real-world clinical practice.

methodsPatients were selected from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. Chi-square bivariate analysis was used for the association of binary qualitative variables. A multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to determine the impact of these prognostic factors on OS.

resultsA total of 46 030 patients were included (51.3% men, mean age 67.03 ± 11.6), of whom 41.3% presented with metastases in bone, 28.9% in brain, 17.1% in liver and 31.8% in lung. Patients with liver metastases presented with two or more metastatic sites more frequently than patients without liver metastases (P < 0.001). Male sex (HR 0.78, 95% CI: 0.76-0.80), age ≥ 65 years (HR 1.37, 95% CI: 1.33-1.40), lack of family support (HR 0.80, 95% CI: 0.78-0.81) and presence of liver (HR 1.45, 95% CI: 1.40-1.50), bone (HR 1.21, 95% CI: 1.18-1.24) or brain metastases (HR 1.18, 95% CI: 1.15-1.21) were identified as poor prognostic factors for OS. Patients with liver metastasis showed the highest hazard ratio value (P < 0.001).

conclusionsThe presence of liver metastases was the worst prognostic factor for patients with metastatic lung ADC. This factor should be considered as a stratification factor for future studies evaluating new cancer treatments including immunotherapy. KEY POINTS: SIGNIFICANT FINDINGS OF THE STUDY: Regression analysis identified poor prognostic factors for overall survival. Factors were male sex, age ≥ 65 years, lack of family support and presence of liver, bone and brain metastases. Patients with liver metastasis showed the highest HR (HR = 1.45 95% CI: 1.40-1.50). This study included the highest number of adenocarcinoma patients analyzed so far (N = 46 030). What this study adds The presence of liver metastases should be considered as a stratification factor for future studies evaluating new cancer treatments including immunotherapy.

Indexed as

Adenocarcinoma of LungAgedFemaleHumansMaleNeoplasm MetastasisPrognosisSEER ProgramLung adenocarcinomametastasisnon-small cell lung canceroverall survivalprognostic factor

Identifiers

PMID32986309
PMCPMC7606019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.