Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32986282›Full record

ArticleCurrent protocols in molecular biology2020

Optimized Transgene Delivery Using Third-Generation Lentiviruses.

Katherine P Gill, Mark Denham

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current protocols in molecular biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Sensitization of cancer cells to DNA-damaging agents by expression of the REV1 C-terminal domain: Implications for chemotherapy.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katherine P GillDanish Research Institute of Translational Neuroscience (DANDRITE), Nordic EMBL Partnership for Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Mark DenhamDanish Research Institute of Translational Neuroscience (DANDRITE), Nordic EMBL Partnership for Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Aarhus University · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The lentivirus system enables efficient genetic modification of both dividing and non-dividing cells and therefore is a useful tool for elucidating developmental processes and disease pathogenesis. The development of third-generation lentiviruses has resulted in improved biosafety, low immunogenicity, and substantial packaging capabilities. However, because third-generation lentiviruses require successful co-transfection with four plasmids, this typically means that lower titers are attained. This is problematic, as it is often desirable to produce purified lentiviruses with high titers (>1 × 10

Indexed as

Gene Transfer TechniquesTransgenesAnimalsCell Culture TechniquesCell LineFlow CytometryGene ExpressionGenetic EngineeringGenetic VectorsHEK293 CellsHumansLentivirusPlasmidsTransduction, GeneticTransfectionhigh titerlentiviral productionlipofectionthird-generationultracentrifugation

Identifiers

PMID32986282
PMCPMC7583475
OpenAlexW3089210840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.