ArticleClinical rheumatology2021
Performance of the RABBIT infection risk score in an Argentinian rheumatoid arthritis cohort.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multiple morbidities are associated with serious infections in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism · 2024Article
- [Latest findings from the RABBIT register].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Patients with rheumatic autoimmune diseases have a higher risk of infections compared with age-and sex-matched controls. In Latin America, there are no validated tools to assess the risk of serious infection. The objectives were to estimate the incidence of serious infections in a cohort of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients followed for 12 months and to validate the RABBIT risk score for serious infections. Patients with RA were included and followed for 12 months. Baseline sociodemographic data, comorbidities, RA characteristics, and vaccination status were recorded. The baseline RABBIT risk score was calculated. Serious infections were documented, describing site and time since enrollment. Six hundred five patients were included (13 centers). The incidence of serious infection was 5% (95% CI 3-7). The most frequent sites were respiratory and urinary (90%). Performance of RABBIT risk score: patients with no infection during follow-up had a median score of 1.2 (IQR 0.8-2.1) and patients with infection 5.1 (IQR 2.15-12.6) p 0.00001. ROC curve analysis: AUC 0.86 (95% CI 0.8-0.94), best cut-off 2.85 (sensibility 75%, specificity 85%). The incidence of serious infections was 5% during the follow-up. The RABBIT score performed excellently in our patients. Key Points • The RABBIT risk score for serious infections showed an excellent performance in a population different (Latin America) from the original one included in the German registry. • This may assist rheumatologists in selecting drugs for patients according to the individual risk of infection, in a fast and simple way.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.