Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32985992›Full record

ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2020

Smartphone Apps to Support Falls Rehabilitation Exercise: App Development and Usability and Acceptability Study.

Helen Hawley-Hague, Carlo Tacconi, Sabato Mellone, Ellen Martinez, Claire Ford, Lorenzo Chiari, Jorunn Helbostad, Chris Todd

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Staying engaged: a scoping review of psychological and motivational drivers of adherence to technology-supported physical activity in older adults.European review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Helen Hawley-Hague *University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2451-4482
Carlo TacconiHealth Sciences and Technologies-Interdepartmental Center for Industrial Research, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8587-5225
Sabato MelloneHealth Sciences and Technologies-Interdepartmental Center for Industrial Research, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7688-0188
Ellen MartinezManchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3152-9006
Claire FordUniversity of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2950-1565
Lorenzo ChiariHealth Sciences and Technologies-Interdepartmental Center for Industrial Research, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2318-4370
Jorunn HelbostadNorwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-0214-9290
Chris ToddUniversity of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6645-4505

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFalls have implications for older adults' health and well-being. Strength and balance interventions significantly reduce the risk of falls. However, patients do not always perform the unsupervised home exercise needed for fall reduction.

objectiveThis study aims to develop motivational smartphone apps co-designed with health professionals and older adults to support patients to perform exercise proven to aid fall reduction and to explore the apps' usability and acceptability with both health professionals and patients.

methodsThere were 3 phases of app development that included analysis, design, and implementation. For analysis, we examined the literature to establish key app components and had a consultation with 12 older adults attending a strength and balance class, exercise instructors, and 3 fall services. For design, we created prototype apps and conducted 2 patient and public involvement workshops, one with 5 health professionals and the second with 8 older adults from an exercise group. The apps were revised based on the feedback. For implementation, we tested them with one fall service and their patients for 3 weeks. Participatory evaluation was used through testing, semistructured interviews, and focus groups to explore acceptability and usability. Focus groups were conducted with the service that tested the apps and two other services. Qualitative data were analyzed using the framework approach.

resultsOn the basis of findings from the literature and consultations in the analysis phase, we selected Behavior Change Techniques, such as goal setting, action planning, and feedback on behavior, to be key parts of the app. We developed goals using familiar icons for patients to select and add while self-reporting exercise and decided to develop 2 apps, one for patients (My Activity Programme) and one for health professionals (Motivate Me). This enabled health professionals to guide patients through the goal-setting process, making it more accessible to nontechnology users. Storyboards were created during the design phase, leading to prototypes of "Motivate Me" and "My Activity Programme." Key changes from the workshops included being able to add more details about the patients' exercise program and a wider selection of goals within "Motivate Me." The overall app design was acceptable to health professionals and older adults. In total, 7 patients and 3 health professionals participated in testing in the implementation phase, with interviews conducted with 6 patients and focus groups, with 3 teams (11 health professionals). Barriers, facilitators, and further functionality were identified for both apps, with 2 cross-cutting themes around phone usability and confidence.

conclusionsThe motivational apps were found to be acceptable for older adults taking part in the design stage and patients and health professionals testing the apps in a clinical setting. User-led design is important to ensure that the apps are usable and acceptable.

Indexed as

Mobile ApplicationsSmartphoneAccidental FallsAgedExerciseExercise TherapyHumansaccidental fallsagedpatient compliancepostural balancetelerehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID32985992
PMCPMC7551104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.