Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32985972›Full record

ArticleeLife2020

Experience, circuit dynamics, and forebrain recruitment in larval zebrafish prey capture.

Claire S Oldfield, Irene Grossrubatscher, Mario Chávez, Adam Hoagland, Alex R Huth, Elizabeth C Carroll, Andrew Prendergast, Tony Qu, Jack L Gallant, Claire Wyart and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Uncovering multiscale structure in the variability of larval zebrafish navigation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Behavioral Assays Dissecting NMDA Receptor Function in Zebrafish.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Whole-brain imaging of freely-moving zebrafish.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Claire S Oldfield *Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute and Graduate Program, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, United States.
Irene Grossrubatscher *Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute and Graduate Program, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7285-6375
Mario ChávezCNRS-UMR, Paris, France.
Adam HoaglandDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, United States.
Alex R HuthHelen Wills Neuroscience Institute and Graduate Program, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, United States.
Elizabeth C CarrollDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, United States.
Andrew PrendergastCNRS-UMR, Paris, France.
Tony QuDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, United States.
Jack L GallantHelen Wills Neuroscience Institute and Graduate Program, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7273-1054
Claire WyartCNRS-UMR, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1668-4975
Ehud Y IsacoffHelen Wills Neuroscience Institute and Graduate Program, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4775-9359
University of California, Berkeley · USCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory · US

Funding

NDC for the Optical Control of Biological FunctionPN2EY018241 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI ISACOFF, EHUD · 2006 to 2015
$37.5M
Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency N66001-17-C-4015EMBO ALTF 549–2013ERC #311673NEI NIH HHS PN2 EY018241NIH HHS 2PN2EY018241
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Experience influences behavior, but little is known about how experience is encoded in the brain, and how changes in neural activity are implemented at a network level to improve performance. Here we investigate how differences in experience impact brain circuitry and behavior in larval zebrafish prey capture. We find that experience of live prey compared to inert food increases capture success by boosting capture initiation. In response to live prey, animals with and without prior experience of live prey show activity in visual areas (pretectum and optic tectum) and motor areas (cerebellum and hindbrain), with similar visual area retinotopic maps of prey position. However, prey-experienced animals more readily initiate capture in response to visual area activity and have greater visually-evoked activity in two forebrain areas: the telencephalon and habenula. Consequently, disruption of habenular neurons reduces capture performance in prey-experienced fish. Together, our results suggest that experience of prey strengthens prey-associated visual drive to the forebrain, and that this lowers the threshold for prey-associated visual activity to trigger activity in motor areas, thereby improving capture performance.

Indexed as

AnimalsLearningPredatory BehaviorProsencephalonVisual PathwaysZebrafishbrainexperienceforebrainneural circuitneuroscienceprey capturezebrafish

Identifiers

PMID32985972
PMCPMC7561350
OpenAlexW3089021353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.