ArticleNeural regeneration research2021
Influence of spinal cord injury on core regions of motor function.
Article in Neural regeneration research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rapid and efficient optical tissue clearing for volumetric imaging of the intact and injured spinal cord in mice.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
- Combined transcriptomics and proteomics studies on the effect of electrical stimulation on spinal cord injury in rats.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Generation of locomotor‑like activity using monopolar intraspinal electrical microstimulation in rats.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2023Article
- Association between brain N-acetylaspartate levels and sensory and motor dysfunction in patients who have spinal cord injury with spasticity: an observational case-control study.Neural regeneration research · 2023Article
- Diffusion tensor imaging reveals brain structure changes in dogs after spinal cord injury.Neural regeneration research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Functional electrical stimulation is an effective way to rebuild hindlimb motor function after spinal cord injury. However, no site map exists to serve as a reference for implanting stimulator electrodes. In this study, rat models of thoracic spinal nerve 9 contusion were established by a heavy-impact method and rat models of T6/8/9 spinal cord injury were established by a transection method. Intraspinal microstimulation was performed to record motion types, site coordinates, and threshold currents induced by stimulation. After transection (complete injury), the core region of hip flexion migrated from the T13 to T12 vertebral segment, and the core region of hip extension migrated from the L1 to T13 vertebral segment. Migration was affected by post-transection time, but not transection segment. Moreover, the longer the post-transection time, the longer the distance of migration. This study provides a reference for spinal electrode implantation after spinal cord injury. This study was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Nantong University, China (approval No. 20190225-008) on February 26, 2019.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.