ArticleNeural regeneration research2021
Combination of epidural electrical stimulation with
Article in Neural regeneration research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessment of Chronic Multi-Electrode Spinal Cord Electrical Stimulation and Electromyography Platform in Non-Human Primates.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Functional characterization and therapeutic potential of human umbilical cord blood mononuclear cells.Regenerative therapy · 2025Review
- Recent Advances in the Treatment of Spinal Cord Injury.The archives of bone and joint surgery · 2024Review
- A new peptide, VD11, promotes structural and functional recovery after spinal cord injury.Neural regeneration research · 2023Article
- Drivers of consumers' behavioral intention toward private umbilical cord blood banking: a review.Cell and tissue banking · 2023Review
- Exercise combined with administration of adipose-derived stem cells ameliorates neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury.Neural regeneration research · 2023Article
- Molecular and cellular changes in the post-traumatic spinal cord remodeling after autoinfusion of a genetically-enriched leucoconcentrate in a mini-pig model.Neural regeneration research · 2023Article
- Circulating exosomal lncRNA contributes to the pathogenesis of spinal cord injury in rats.Neural regeneration research · 2023Article
- Combination therapy with ultrasound and 2D nanomaterials promotes recovery after spinal cord injury via Piezo1 downregulation.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2023Article
- Review
- Electrical stimulation for the treatment of spinal cord injuries: A review of the cellular and molecular mechanisms that drive functional improvements.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2023Review
- Article
- Growth Factors VEGF-AInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Epidural Stimulation Combined with Triple Gene Therapy for Spinal Cord Injury Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite emerging contemporary biotechnological methods such as gene- and stem cell-based therapy, there are no clinically established therapeutic strategies for neural regeneration after spinal cord injury. Our previous studies have demonstrated that transplantation of genetically engineered human umbilical cord blood mononuclear cells producing three recombinant therapeutic molecules, including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), glial cell-line derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF), and neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM) can improve morpho-functional recovery of injured spinal cord in rats and mini-pigs. To investigate the efficacy of human umbilical cord blood mononuclear cells-mediated triple-gene therapy combined with epidural electrical stimulation in the treatment of spinal cord injury, in this study, rats with moderate spinal cord contusion injury were intrathecally infused with human umbilical cord blood mononuclear cells expressing recombinant genes VEGF165, GDNF, NCAM1 at 4 hours after spinal cord injury. Three days after injury, epidural stimulations were given simultaneously above the lesion site at C5 (to stimulate the cervical network related to forelimb functions) and below the lesion site at L2 (to activate the central pattern generators) every other day for 4 weeks. Rats subjected to the combined treatment showed a limited functional improvement of the knee joint, high preservation of muscle fiber area in tibialis anterior muscle and increased H/M ratio in gastrocnemius muscle 30 days after spinal cord injury. However, beneficial cellular outcomes such as reduced apoptosis and increased sparing of the gray and white matters, and enhanced expression of heat shock and synaptic proteins were found in rats with spinal cord injury subjected to the combined epidural electrical stimulation with gene therapy. This study presents the first proof of principle study of combination of the multisite epidural electrical stimulation with ex vivo triple gene therapy (VEGF, GDNF and NCAM) for treatment of spinal cord injury in rat models. The animal protocols were approved by the Kazan State Medical University Animal Care and Use Committee (approval No. 2.20.02.18) on February 20, 2018.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.