Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32985468›Full record

ReviewNeural regeneration research2021

Current scenario of the genetic testing for rare neurological disorders exploiting next generation sequencing.

Chiara Di Resta, Giovanni Battista Pipitone, Paola Carrera, Maurizio Ferrari

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neural regeneration research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chiara Di RestaVita-Salute San Raffaele University; Unit of Genomics for Human Disease Diagnosis, Division of Genetics and Cell Biology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Giovanni Battista PipitoneClinical Molecular Biology Laboratory, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Paola CarreraUnit of Genomics for Human Disease Diagnosis, Division of Genetics and Cell Biology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute; Clinical Molecular Biology Laboratory, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Maurizio FerrariVita-Salute San Raffaele University; Unit of Genomics for Human Disease Diagnosis, Division of Genetics and Cell Biology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute; Clinical Molecular Biology Laboratory, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITVita-Salute San Raffaele University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Next generation sequencing is currently a cornerstone of genetic testing in routine diagnostics, allowing for the detection of sequence variants with so far unprecedented large scale, mainly in genetically heterogenous diseases, such as neurological disorders. It is a fast-moving field, where new wet enrichment protocols and bioinformatics tools are constantly being developed to overcome initial limitations. Despite the as yet undiscussed advantages, however, there are still some challenges in data analysis and the interpretation of variants. In this review, we address the current state of next generation sequencing diagnostic testing for inherited human disorders, particularly giving an overview of the available high-throughput sequencing approaches; including targeted, whole-exome and whole-genome sequencing; and discussing the main critical aspects of the bioinformatic process, from raw data analysis to molecular diagnosis.

Indexed as

clinical practicegenetic testingneurogenesisnext generation sequencingsequencing approachesvariant interpretation

Identifiers

PMID32985468
PMCPMC7996035
OpenAlexW3088571285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.