ArticleAnalytical chemistry2020
Automating and Extending Comprehensive Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography Data Processing by Interfacing Open-Source and Commercial Software.
Article in Analytical chemistry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of peak alignment performance of commercial and open-source tools for GC×GC-MS based non-targeted screening.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- INdoor Home Air Level Exploration (INHALE) Study: Protocol to Monitor Indoor Pollution in British Dwellings.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- GcDUO: an open-source software for GC × GC-MS data analysis.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Automated Composition Assessment of Natural Extracts: Untargeted Mass Spectrometry-Based Metabolite Profiling Integrating Semiquantitative Detection.Journal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2023Article
- Visualization of exhaled breath metabolites reveals distinct diagnostic signatures for acute cardiorespiratory breathlessness.Science translational medicine · 2022Article
- Application of a Target-Guided Data Processing Approach in Saturated Peak Correction of GC×GC Analysis.Analytical chemistry · 2022Article
- Low-cost and open-source strategies for chemical separations.Journal of chromatography. A · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (GC×GC) is a powerful analytical tool for both nontargeted and targeted analyses. However, there is a need for more integrated workflows for processing and managing the resultant high-complexity datasets. End-to-end workflows for processing GC×GC data are challenging and often require multiple tools or software to process a single dataset. We describe a new approach, which uses an existing underutilized interface within commercial software to integrate free and open-source/external scripts and tools, tailoring the workflow to the needs of the individual researcher within a single software environment. To demonstrate the concept, the interface was successfully used to complete a first-pass alignment on a large-scale GC×GC metabolomics dataset. The analysis was performed by interfacing bespoke and published external algorithms within a commercial software environment to automatically correct the variation in retention times captured by a routine reference standard. Variation in
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.