Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32985164›Full record

ReviewZhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences2020

[Progress on axon regeneration in model organisms].

Peiran Jiang, Zhiping Wang

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 89% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Peiran JiangSchool of Brain Science and Brain Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.
Zhiping WangSchool of Brain Science and Brain Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.
Zhejiang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Different from neurons in the peripheral nervous system, mature neurons in the mammalian central nervous system often fail to regenerate after injury. Recent studies have found that calcium transduction, injury signaling, mitochondrial transportation, cytoskeletal remodeling and protein synthesis play essential roles in axon regeneration. Firstly, axon injury increases the intracellular concentration of calcium, and initiates the injury signaling pathways including cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP)-protein kinase A (PKA) and dual leucine kinase (DLK), which are found to promote axon regeneration in multiple animal injury models. The second step for axonal regrowth is to rebuild growth cones. Overexpressing proteins that promote dynamics of microtubules and actin filaments is beneficial for the reassembly of cytoskeletons and initiation of new growth cones. Thirdly, mitochondria, the power factory for cells, also play important roles in growth cone formation and axonal extension. The last but not the least important step is the regulation of gene transcription and protein translation to sustain the regrowth of axons. This review summarizes important findings revealing the functions and mechanisms of these biological progresses.

Indexed as

AxonsNerve RegenerationNeurologyResearchAnimalsGrowth ConesModels, AnimalAxonMitochondrial transportationModel organismsRegenerationReview

Identifiers

PMID32985164
PMCPMC8800700
OpenAlexW3089160550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.