ArticleInvestigative and clinical urology2020
Trends in utilization of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy for muscle invasive bladder cancer.
Article in Investigative and clinical urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perioperative enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: unprecedented outcomes from KEYNOTE-B15.The oncologist · 2026Article
- Survey of perioperative treatment in muscle-invasive bladder cancer using Japanese hospital-based claims database.BMC urology · 2025Article
- Real-world impact of cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy on bladder cancer survival: a 20-year study.World journal of urology · 2025Article
- Race/Ethnicity Affects Access and Survival Differences After Neoadjuvant or Adjuvant Chemotherapy at Radical Cystectomy in Urothelial Carcinoma Patients.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2025Article
- The effect of race/ethnicity on cancer-specific mortality after trimodal therapy.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2025Article
- Molecular Subtyping for Predicting Pathological Upstaging and Survival Outcomes in Clinically Organ-confined Bladder Cancer Patients Undergoing Radical Cystectomy.European urology open science · 2025Article
- Real-world data on utilization of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle invasive bladder cancer: impact on surgical complications and oncological efficacy.Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) · 2025Article
- Observational
- Income Disparities in Survival and Receipt of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024Article
- Neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to radical cystectomy for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: national trends and pathologic outcomes.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Patterns of chemotherapy use in muscle-invasive bladder cancer in a tertiary centre.Bladder (San Francisco, Calif.) · 2023Article
- Prognostic value of hepatocyte growth factor for muscle-invasive bladder cancer.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2022Article
- Neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy in bladder cancer: a nationwide cohort study.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2022Article
- Using Cell Lines To Guide Neoadjuvant Therapy in Bladder Cancer: COXEN and SWOG S1314.European urology focus · 2022Article
- Perioperative circulating tumor DNA enables the identification of patients with poor prognosis in upper tract urothelial carcinoma.Cancer science · 2022Article
- Article
- Disease Management of Clinical Complete Responders to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy of Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Review of Literature.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- Impact of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Population Based Analysis.Bladder cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePrevious studies have noted increased utilization of perioperative chemotherapy over time. The goal of this study was to determine trends in perioperative chemotherapy use within a contemporary population. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe National Cancer Database was queried for patients diagnosed with cT2-4N0M0 urothelial muscle invasive bladder cancer from 2011 to 2015 and underwent subsequent radical cystectomy. We retrospectively analyzed factors associated with perioperative chemotherapy and evaluated overall treatment trends in the use of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy. Linear regression, logistic regression, Cox regression, and Kaplan-Meier analysis were performed.
resultsIn total, 7,101 patients met inclusion criteria for analysis. The use of perioperative chemotherapy increased from 46.4% in 2011 to 57.2% in 2015 (p=0.003). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy use increased from 22.9% to 32.3% (p=0.007) over the time period analyzed, while adjuvant chemotherapy use experienced no significant change (23.5% to 24.9%, p=0.182). Logistic regression demonstrated that increased age and Charlson Comorbidity Index were predictors of not receiving chemotherapy (p<0.05), while those with increasing T stage, income above $48,000, and insurance other than Medicaid or Medicare were more likely to receive perioperative chemotherapy (p<0.05). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy had the best 5-year overall survival at 48.3% compared to adjuvant chemotherapy (42.6%) or no chemotherapy (37.8%) (p<0.001).
conclusionsThe increasing use of perioperative chemotherapy noted in prior studies has continued through 2015. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy appears to drive this increase while adjuvant chemotherapy utilization remains unchanged. Clinical and socioeconomic factors affect utilization of perioperative chemotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.