Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32985142›Full record

ArticleInvestigative and clinical urology2020

Trends in utilization of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy for muscle invasive bladder cancer.

Coleman McFerrin, Facundo Davaro, Allison May, Syed Raza, Sameer Siddiqui, Zachary Hamilton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative and clinical urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The effect of race/ethnicity on cancer-specific mortality after trimodal therapy.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Prognostic value of hepatocyte growth factor for muscle-invasive bladder cancer.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Coleman McFerrinDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6511-9200
Facundo DavaroDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4116-3343
Allison MayDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1959-8773
Syed RazaDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7608-8067
Sameer SiddiquiDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8187-2403
Zachary HamiltonDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, USA. zachary.hamilton@health.slu.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-2587-0865

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePrevious studies have noted increased utilization of perioperative chemotherapy over time. The goal of this study was to determine trends in perioperative chemotherapy use within a contemporary population. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe National Cancer Database was queried for patients diagnosed with cT2-4N0M0 urothelial muscle invasive bladder cancer from 2011 to 2015 and underwent subsequent radical cystectomy. We retrospectively analyzed factors associated with perioperative chemotherapy and evaluated overall treatment trends in the use of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy. Linear regression, logistic regression, Cox regression, and Kaplan-Meier analysis were performed.

resultsIn total, 7,101 patients met inclusion criteria for analysis. The use of perioperative chemotherapy increased from 46.4% in 2011 to 57.2% in 2015 (p=0.003). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy use increased from 22.9% to 32.3% (p=0.007) over the time period analyzed, while adjuvant chemotherapy use experienced no significant change (23.5% to 24.9%, p=0.182). Logistic regression demonstrated that increased age and Charlson Comorbidity Index were predictors of not receiving chemotherapy (p<0.05), while those with increasing T stage, income above $48,000, and insurance other than Medicaid or Medicare were more likely to receive perioperative chemotherapy (p<0.05). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy had the best 5-year overall survival at 48.3% compared to adjuvant chemotherapy (42.6%) or no chemotherapy (37.8%) (p<0.001).

conclusionsThe increasing use of perioperative chemotherapy noted in prior studies has continued through 2015. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy appears to drive this increase while adjuvant chemotherapy utilization remains unchanged. Clinical and socioeconomic factors affect utilization of perioperative chemotherapy.

Indexed as

AgedCarcinoma, Transitional CellChemotherapy, AdjuvantCystectomyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm InvasivenessRetrospective StudiesUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsDrug therapyNeoplasm invasivenessSurvivalUrinary bladder neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID32985142
PMCPMC7606117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.