Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32985088›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of heart failure2020

Omecamtiv mecarbil in chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: GALACTIC-HF baseline characteristics and comparison with contemporary clinical trials.

John R Teerlink, Rafael Diaz, G Michael Felker, John J V McMurray, Marco Metra, Scott D Solomon, Kirkwood F Adams, Inder Anand, Alexandra Arias-Mendoza, Tor Biering-Sørensen and 39 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of heart failure, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

49 authors at 20 institutions in 33 countries.

John R TeerlinkSection of Cardiology, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center and School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Rafael DiazEstudios Clinicos Latino America (ECLA), Rosario, Argentina.
G Michael FelkerDivision of Cardiology, Duke University School of Medicine and Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA.
John J V McMurrayBritish Heart Foundation Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Marco MetraCardiology, ASST Spedali Civili; Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Scott D SolomonDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Kirkwood F AdamsUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Inder AnandUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Alexandra Arias-MendozaInstituto Nacional de Cardiologìa, Mexico City, Mexico.
Tor Biering-SørensenDepartment of Cardiology, Herlev & Gentofte Hospital & Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Michael BöhmSaarland University, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg, Germany.
Diana BondermanMedical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
John G F ClelandNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, UK.
Ramon CorbalanPontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Maria G Crespo-LeiroComplexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña (CHUAC). CIBERCV. INIBIC. Universidade da Coruña, A Coruña, Spain.
Ulf DahlströmDepartment of Cardiology and Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linkoping University, Linkoping, Sweden.
Luis E Echeverria CorreaFundacion Cardiovascular de Colombia, Floridablanca, Colombia.
James C FangUniversity of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Gerasimos FilippatosUniversity of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Cândida FonsecaHospital S. Francisco Xavier, CHLO; NOVA Medical School, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Eva GoncalvesovaCommenius Universtity, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Assen R GoudevDepartment of Cardiology, Queen Giovanna University Hospital and Medical University, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Jonathan G HowlettLibin Cardiovascular Institute and Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
David E LanfearHenry Ford Heart and Vascular Institute, Detroit, MI, USA.
Mayanna LundMiddlemore Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.
Peter MacdonaldSt. Vincent's Hospital Sydney, Darlinghurst, Australia.
Vyacheslav MareevUniversity Clinic of Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.
Shin-Ichi MomomuraSaitama Citizens Medical Center, Saitama, Japan.
Eileen O'MearaMontreal Heart Institute and Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
Alexander ParkhomenkoInstitute of Cardiology, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Piotr PonikowskiWroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
Felix J A RamiresInstituto do Coração (InCor), Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Pranas SerpytisVilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Karen SliwaUniversity of Cape Town, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Jindrich SpinarUniversity Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.
Thomas M SuterBern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Janos TomcsanyiSt. John of God Hospital, Budapest, Hungary.
Hans VandekerckhoveAZ Sint-Lucas, Ghent, Belgium.
Dragos VinereanuUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, University and Emergency Hospital, Bucharest, Romania.
Adriaan A VoorsUniversity of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Mehmet B YilmazDokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey.
Faiez ZannadUniversité de Lorraine, Inserm INI CRCT, CHRU Nancy, Nancy, France.
Lucie SharpstenAmgen, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
Jason C LeggAmgen, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
Siddique A AbbasiAmgen, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
Claire VarinServier, Suresnes, France.
Fady I MalikCytokinetics, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Christopher E KurtzAmgen, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
GALACTIC-HF Investigators
Amgen (United States) · USAZ Sint-Lucas · BEBrigham and Women's Hospital · USCarol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy · ROCitizen (Japan) · JPClinical Research Institute · USComenius University Bratislava · SKCytokinetics (United States) · USDokuz Eylül University · TREstudios Clínicos Latinoamérica · ARFundación Cardiovascular de Colombia · COGentofte Hospital · DKHenry Ford Hospital · USHospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo · BRImperial College London · GBInstituto de Investigación Biomédica de A Coruña · ESInstituto Nacional de Cardiologia · BRLinköping University · SEMedical University of Vienna · ATMiddlemore Hospital · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThe safety and efficacy of the novel selective cardiac myosin activator, omecamtiv mecarbil, in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is being tested in the Global Approach to Lowering Adverse Cardiac outcomes Through Improving Contractility in Heart Failure (GALACTIC-HF) trial. Here we describe the baseline characteristics of participants in GALACTIC-HF and how these compare with other contemporary trials. METHODS AND

resultsAdults with established HFrEF, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class ≥II, ejection fraction ≤35%, elevated natriuretic peptides and either current hospitalization for heart failure or history of hospitalization/emergency department visit for heart failure within a year were randomized to either placebo or omecamtiv mecarbil (pharmacokinetic-guided dosing: 25, 37.5, or 50 mg bid). A total of 8256 patients [male (79%), non-white (22%), mean age 65 years] were enrolled with a mean ejection fraction 27%, ischaemic aetiology in 54%, NYHA class II 53% and III/IV 47%, and median N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide 1971 pg/mL. Heart failure therapies at baseline were among the most effectively employed in contemporary heart failure trials. GALACTIC-HF randomized patients representative of recent heart failure registries and trials with substantial numbers of patients also having characteristics understudied in previous trials including more from North America (n = 1386), enrolled as inpatients (n = 2084), systolic blood pressure <100 mmHg (n = 1127), estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min/1.73 m

conclusionsGALACTIC-HF enrolled a well-treated, high-risk population from both inpatient and outpatient settings, which will provide a definitive evaluation of the efficacy and safety of this novel therapy, as well as informing its potential future implementation.

Indexed as

Heart FailureAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedStroke VolumeUreaVentricular Function, Leftomecamtiv mecarbilUreaCardiac myosin activatorCardiovascular outcomes trialHeart failureInotropeMyotropeOmecamtiv mecarbil

Identifiers

PMID32985088
PMCPMC7756903
OpenAlexW3088948579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.