ArticleGesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany))2020
[Exercise Behavior, Costs of Physical Inactivity, and Physical Activity Promotion in Austria].
Article in Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ganz Salzburg bewegen [All of Salzburg Moving]: a large-scale public involvement project with underserved groups, for the co-design of local and contextualized physical activity promotion concepts.Research involvement and engagement · 2025Article
- Regional Differences in Self-Reported Health, Physical Activity and Physical Fitness of Urban Senior Citizens in Austria.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Health Impact Assessment (HIA) of a Daily Physical Activity Unit in Schools: Focus on Children and Adolescents in Austria Up to the 8th Grade.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Review
- [Determinants of Exercise, Fulfilling the Recommendations for Aerobic Physical Activity and Health Status: Results of a Correlation Study in the Federal States of Austria].Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this article, we present the Austrian data on physical activity, the societal costs and outcomes of physical inactivity, and the areas of influence to promote physical activity. Based on an analysis of the status quo and its consequences, suggestions on relevant measures to counter physical inactivity are made. While the proportion of Austrians that do not fulfill the current recommendations on physical activity is high, the Austrian population is physically more active than many populations of other countries. In Austria, major differences in physical activity are associated with demographic, socio-economic, and geographic factors. The economic burden related to physical inactivity is considerable, with regard to both societal costs and outcomes. This includes major health and social care costs, productivity losses (estimated at around 248 million Euro in 2017 in Austria), and life years lost due to premature death. Evidence-based areas of influence to increase physical activity include kindergartens and schools, the workplace, communities, cities, long-term care facilities, and nature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.