Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32984934›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2020

Value of the surgeon's sightline on hologram registration and targeting in mixed reality.

Javier A Luzon, Bojan V Stimec, Arne O Bakka, Bjørn Edwin, Dejan Ignjatovic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Registration Techniques for Clinical Applications of Three-Dimensional Augmented Reality Devices.IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Javier A LuzonInstitute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. jaluzon@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6805-7076
Bojan V StimecFaculty of Medicine, Teaching Unit, Anatomy Sector, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Arne O BakkaInstitute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Bjørn EdwinInstitute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Dejan IgnjatovicInstitute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

Helse Sør-Øst RHF 17/00264-9
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMixed reality (MR) is being evaluated as a visual tool for surgical navigation. Current literature presents unclear results on intraoperative accuracy using the Microsoft HoloLens 1

methodsSurgeons at Akershus University Hospital tested this system. A custom-made phantom was used, containing 18 wire target crosses within its inner walls. A CT scan was obtained in order to segment all wire targets into a single 3D-model (hologram). An in-house software application (CTrue), developed for the Microsoft HoloLens 1, uploaded 3D-models and automatically registered the 3D-model with the phantom. Based on the surgeon's sightline while registering and targeting (free sightline /F/or a strictly perpendicular sightline /P/), 4 scenarios were developed (FF-PF-FP-PP). Target error distance (TED) was obtained in three different working axes-(XYZ).

resultsSix surgeons (5 males, age 29-62) were enrolled. A total of 864 measurements were collected in 4 scenarios, twice. Scenario PP showed the smallest TED in XYZ-axes mean = 2.98 mm ± SD 1.33; 2.28 mm ± SD 1.45; 2.78 mm ± SD 1.91, respectively. Scenario FF showed the largest TED in XYZ-axes with mean = 10.03 mm ± SD 3.19; 6.36 mm ± SD 3.36; 16.11 mm ± SD 8.91, respectively. Multiple comparison tests, grouped in scenarios and axes, showed that the majority of scenario comparisons had significantly different TED values (p < 0.05). Y-axis always presented the smallest TED regardless of scenario tested.

conclusionA strictly perpendicular working sightline in relation to the 3D-model achieves the best accuracy results. Shortcomings in this technology, as an intraoperative visual cue, can be overcome by sightline correction. Incidentally, this is the preferred working angle for open surgery.

Indexed as

Augmented RealitySurgeonsAdultFemaleHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMaleMiddle AgedOperating RoomsPhantoms, ImagingSoftwareSurgery, Computer-AssistedTomography, X-Ray Computed3D modelingAugmented realityColorectal surgeryComputer-assisted surgeryImage-guided surgeryThree-dimensional imaging

Identifiers

PMID32984934
PMCPMC7671978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.