Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32984813›Full record

ArticleHealth policy OPEN2020

Public policies that shaped the american physician assistant.

Roderick S Hooker, James F Cawley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health policy OPEN, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Roderick S HookerScholar in Residence and Visiting Professor Physician Assistant Leadership and Learning Academy Graduate School University of Maryland Baltimore, USA.
James F CawleyPhysician Assistant Leadership and Learning Academy, The Graduate School, University of Maryland Baltimore, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe American physician assistant (PA) was created through a series of federal policies and legislative acts. Each was intended to improve society through advancements in the delivery of healthcare. The theory why this public policy developed has been unexplored.

methodA search of reports was undertaken to identify national legislation that enabled the PA to be included in the American medical workforce. The effect was a chronology of federal acts and policies.

resultsIn the early 1960s editorials, conference proceedings, and reports signaled that more access to physician services was needed for a growing American society. Beginning in 1965 with a series of congressional acts such as Medicare and Medicaid, a call was made for a physician analog. Envisioned was a type of assistant who could undertake many of the routine responsibilities of the doctor. Half a century later the number of clinically active PAs exceeds 120,000 and 260 PA programs are operational. What policies gave impetus to this novel health workforce innovation? All the acts and policies produced by Congress or federal agencies that involved PAs were analyzed, summarized, and placed in chronological order. The result reveals an evolution of healthcare reform that continues well into the 21st century.

conclusionFrom 1966 to 2024 (58 years) there were 18 significant federal acts, policies, and improvements that enabled PAs to provide medical services in American society. With each enactment drawing on the success of preceding ones, more expansion of the PA took place and their utilization grew.

Indexed as

FederalismHealth policy theoryHealth professionPhysician assistant

Identifiers

PMID32984813
PMCPMC7505869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.