ArticleThe Lancet. Digital health2020
Deep learning-based triage and analysis of lesion burden for COVID-19: a retrospective study with external validation.
Article in The Lancet. Digital health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
55 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 88 citations in OpenAlex.
- Facilitators and Barriers to Implementing AI in Routine Medical Imaging: Systematic Review and Qualitative Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence for imaging-based COVID-19 detection: Systematic review comparing added value of AI versus human readers.European journal of radiology · 2021Pooled it
- Predictive and operational artificial intelligence in emergency radiology for early risk stratification in acute care settings: a scoping review.European radiology · 2026Article
- An enhancing diagnostic pulmonary diseases diagnostic method for differentiating talaromycosis from tuberculosis.iScience · 2025Article
- Mapping and Summarizing the Research on AI Systems for Automating Medical History Taking and Triage: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Optimising strategies for artificial intelligence-assisted classification of viral pneumonias on CT imaging: a comparative study of selective and default approaches.Polish journal of radiology · 2025Article
- Establishing responsible use of AI guidelines: a comprehensive case study for healthcare institutions.NPJ digital medicine · 2024Review
- Lung field-based severity score (LFSS): a feasible tool to identify COVID-19 patients at high risk of progressing to critical disease.Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Article
- Effects of artificial intelligence implementation on efficiency in medical imaging-a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.NPJ digital medicine · 2024Review
- A multimodal integration pipeline for accurate diagnosis, pathogen identification, and prognosis prediction of pulmonary infections.Innovation (Cambridge (Mass.)) · 2024Article
- Article
- Automatic Lenke classification of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with deep learning.JOR spine · 2024Article
- Predicting the complexity and mortality of polytrauma patients with machine learning models.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Using the Textual Content of Radiological Reports to Detect Emerging Diseases: A Proof-of-Concept Study of COVID-19.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2024Article
- "KAIZEN" method realizing implementation of deep-learning models for COVID-19 CT diagnosis in real world hospitals.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Chronic Lung Injury after COVID-19 Pneumonia: Clinical, Radiologic, and Histopathologic Perspectives.Radiology · 2024Review
- Detection of patients with COVID-19 by the emergency medical services in Lombardy through an operator-based interview and machine learning models.Emergency medicine journal : EMJ · 2023Observational
- A historical perspective of biomedical explainable AI research.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2023Review
- Artificial intelligence system-based histogram analysis of computed tomography features to predict tumor invasiveness of ground-glass nodules.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
- Development of deep learning model and evaluation in real clinical practice of lingual mandibular bone depression (Stafne cyst) on panoramic radiographs.Dento maxillo facial radiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
21 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Prompt identification of patients suspected to have COVID-19 is crucial for disease control. We aimed to develop a deep learning algorithm on the basis of chest CT for rapid triaging in fever clinics. Methods: We trained a U-Net-based model on unenhanced chest CT scans obtained from 2447 patients admitted to Tongji Hospital (Wuhan, China) between Feb 1, 2020, and March 3, 2020 (1647 patients with RT-PCR-confirmed COVID-19 and 800 patients without COVID-19) to segment lung opacities and alert cases with COVID-19 imaging manifestations. The ability of artificial intelligence (AI) to triage patients suspected to have COVID-19 was assessed in a large external validation set, which included 2120 retrospectively collected consecutive cases from three fever clinics inside and outside the epidemic centre of Wuhan (Tianyou Hospital [Wuhan, China; area of high COVID-19 prevalence], Xianning Central Hospital [Xianning, China; area of medium COVID-19 prevalence], and The Second Xiangya Hospital [Changsha, China; area of low COVID-19 prevalence]) between Jan 22, 2020, and Feb 14, 2020. To validate the sensitivity of the algorithm in a larger sample of patients with COVID-19, we also included 761 chest CT scans from 722 patients with RT-PCR-confirmed COVID-19 treated in a makeshift hospital (Guanggu Fangcang Hospital, Wuhan, China) between Feb 21, 2020, and March 6, 2020. Additionally, the accuracy of AI was compared with a radiologist panel for the identification of lesion burden increase on pairs of CT scans obtained from 100 patients with COVID-19. Findings: In the external validation set, using radiological reports as the reference standard, AI-aided triage achieved an area under the curve of 0·953 (95% CI 0·949-0·959), with a sensitivity of 0·923 (95% CI 0·914-0·932), specificity of 0·851 (0·842-0·860), a positive predictive value of 0·790 (0·777-0·803), and a negative predictive value of 0·948 (0·941-0·954). AI took a median of 0·55 min (IQR: 0·43-0·63) to flag a positive case, whereas radiologists took a median of 16·21 min (11·67-25·71) to draft a report and 23·06 min (15·67-39·20) to release a report. With regard to the identification of increases in lesion burden, AI achieved a sensitivity of 0·962 (95% CI 0·947-1·000) and a specificity of 0·875 (95 %CI 0·833-0·923). The agreement between AI and the radiologist panel was high (Cohen's kappa coefficient 0·839, 95% CI 0·718-0·940). Interpretation: A deep learning algorithm for triaging patients with suspected COVID-19 at fever clinics was developed and externally validated. Given its high accuracy across populations with varied COVID-19 prevalence, integration of this system into the standard clinical workflow could expedite identification of chest CT scans with imaging indications of COVID-19. Funding: Special Project for Emergency of the Science and Technology Department of Hubei Province, China.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.