ArticleJB & JS open access
Availability and Readability of Online Patient Information on Osteosarcoma: Assessment of Pediatric Hospital and National Cancer Institute-Designated Cancer Center (NCIDCC) Osteosarcoma Web Pages.
Article in JB & JS open access. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quality and Usability Evaluation of U.S. Clinical Informatics Fellowship Websites.Applied clinical informatics · 2026Article
- Integrating Cancer Education Into High School Curricula.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026Review
- A Readability Analysis of Online Spondylolisthesis and Spondylolysis Patient Resources Among Pediatric Hospital Web Pages: A US-Based Study.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2023Article
- Availability and readability of online patient information on clubfoot: assessment of paediatric hospital clubfoot web pages.Journal of children's orthopaedics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Online patient information (OPI) plays an important role in pediatric orthopaedic patient/caregiver education and decision-making. We assessed the availability and readability of OPI about osteosarcoma found at pediatric hospital and U.S. National Cancer Institute-designated cancer center (NCIDCC) websites.
methodsThe websites of all NCIDCCs and the top 50 pediatric hospitals identified using
resultsOf the 71 NCIDCCs and 50 pediatric hospitals, 48 (67.6%) and 18 (36.0%), respectively, did not have at least 1 web page dedicated to osteosarcoma-specific OPI. The mean OTS for all 116 NCIDCC and pediatric hospital osteosarcoma-specific web pages assessed was 177 estimated visits per month, which was less than the mean OTS for the top 10 Google.com "osteosarcoma" search results (3,287.9; p < 0.001). The 52 NCIDCC web pages with osteosarcoma OPI (representing 23 centers) had an average CGL of 12.9, representing a readability level of at least a high school degree. The mean CGL for the 64 pediatric hospital web pages with osteosarcoma OPI (representing 32 hospitals) was 12.8, also representing readability of at least a high school degree. Only 8 (12.5%) of the 64 web pages were written at a seventh or eighth-grade level.
conclusionsTaken together, the majority of NCIDCCs and pediatric hospitals did not have a dedicated page of OPI for osteosarcoma. Of those that did, NCIDCC and pediatric hospital sites were visited much less frequently than sites visited through the most common Google.com searches. None of the osteosarcoma web pages offering OPI from NCIDCCs and pediatric hospitals met the American Medical Association readability recommendation (sixth-grade reading level). Therefore, greater effort must be made to create and direct patients and parents toward high-quality OPI of the appropriate level. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The clinical relevance of this study lies in its evaluation of OPI and its ability to impact the patient experience of clinical care.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.