Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32984626›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary research2020

Leticia Alcalá García, Carmen Torres, Antonio Rezusta López, Carmelo Ortega Rodríguez, Jesús Orós Espinosa, Carmen Simón Valencia

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Bats as Hosts of Antimicrobial-ResistantVeterinary sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Distribution and Drug Resistance of Bacterial Pathogens Associated with Lower Respiratory Tract Infection in Children and the Effect of COVID-19 on the Distribution of Pathogens.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2022
    Article
  13. Wild Animals Are Reservoirs and Sentinels ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Leticia Alcalá GarcíaDepartment of Animal Pathology, Infectious Diseases and Epidemiology, Veterinary Faculty of Zaragoza, 50013, Zaragoza, Spain.
Carmen TorresDepartment of Food and Agriculture, Area of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of La Rioja, 26006, Logroño, Spain.
Antonio Rezusta LópezMicrobiology Service, Hospital Miguel Servet, IIS Aragón, Universidad de Zaragoza, 50009, Zaragoza, Spain.
Carmelo Ortega RodríguezDepartment of Animal Pathology, Infectious Diseases and Epidemiology, Veterinary Faculty of Zaragoza, 50013, Zaragoza, Spain.
Jesús Orós EspinosaDepartment of Animal Pathology, Infectious Diseases and Epidemiology, Veterinary Faculty of Zaragoza, 50013, Zaragoza, Spain.
Carmen Simón ValenciaDepartment of Animal Pathology, Infectious Diseases and Epidemiology, Veterinary Faculty of Zaragoza, 50013, Zaragoza, Spain.
Universidad de Zaragoza · ESInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria Aragón · ESUniversidad de La Rioja · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAntimicrobial resistance is a global health threat. It has been studied in humans and domestic animals, but there is a lack of data on wild animals. The objective of this study is the elucidation of its patterns in MATERIAL AND

methodsA total of 103 mammals (Artiodactyla, Carnivora, Chiroptera, Erinaceomorpha, and Lagomorpha) were studied. A recovery centre provided 32 and hunting 71. Nasal and faecal samples yielded 111 staphylococci, which were identified by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry. A susceptibility test to 11 antibiotics was carried out, and statistical analysis was performed.

resultsSome differences were detected in bacterial prevalence depending on how the mammal fed. Artiodactyla, mainly hunted, were predisposed to carry coagulase-positive staphylococci. The staphylococci species recovered were resistant to at least two classes of antibiotics, and were disseminated in all of the geographical areas studied.

conclusionResistant staphylococci are widely distributed in the wild mammals in the areas of the study, but the resistance quantified in them is lower than that to be expected if the use of antibiotics in farms had a direct influence on the wildlife and its environment. On the other hand, resistance to antibiotics restricted to human use was widely disseminated in various wild animal species.

Indexed as

antibiotic resistanceepidemiologyStaphylococcus sppwild mammals

Identifiers

PMID32984626
PMCPMC7497752
OpenAlexW3088210220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.