Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32984544›Full record

ArticleBMJ open ophthalmology2020

Case-control study on ocular changes and ophthalmic Doppler velocimetric indices among preeclamptic and normotensive pregnant women in Ibadan, Nigeria.

Chiemelie Onwudiegwu, Ademola Adekanmi, Bolutife Olusanya, Olatunji Lawal, Babatunde Adedokun, Imran Morhason-Bello, Adesina Oladokun

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Doppler parameters of ophthalmic artery in women with preeclampsia: A meta-analysis.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Correlation of Ocular Plane-Wave Doppler With Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in Preeclampsia.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chiemelie OnwudiegwuObstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Ibadan College of Medicine, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Ademola AdekanmiRadiology, University of Ibadan College of Medicine, Ibadan, Oyo, Nigeria.
Bolutife OlusanyaOphthalmology, University of Ibadan College of Medicine, Ibadan, Oyo, Nigeria.
Olatunji LawalObstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Ibadan College of Medicine, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Babatunde AdedokunEpidemiology and Medical Statistics, University of Ibadan College of Medicine, Ibadan, Oyo, Nigeria.
Imran Morhason-BelloObstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Ibadan College of Medicine, Ibadan, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0002-7448-4824
Adesina OladokunObstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Ibadan College of Medicine, Ibadan, Nigeria.
University of Ibadan · NG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the ocular changes and Doppler velocimetric indices in preeclamptic and normotensive pregnant women. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This was a case-control study of 71 preeclamptic women and 72 parity-matched normotensive pregnant women conducted at the University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria. Demographic data were obtained using questionnaires. All participants had visual acuity assessment, funduscopy, intraocular pressure measurement and orbital Doppler ultrasonography. The differences in parameters between the two groups were tested using Student's t-test for quantitative variables and χ

resultsThere were no significant differences between cases and controls with respect to sociodemographic variables. The mean pulsatility index was 1.35±0.46 in cases and 2.1±0.4 in controls (p<0.001); the resistivity index was 0.7±0.18 in cases and 0.83±0.27 among the controls (p=0.01). A similar pattern was observed in the peak systolic velocity (p<0.001) and the peak ratio (p<0.001). There was no significant difference between the groups concerning end-diastolic velocity (p=0.535). Three preeclampsia patients (5.2%) had abnormalities on funduscopy compared with none of the controls. Preeclamptic women had significantly higher intraocular pressures in both eyes at baseline and at 24 hours post delivery.

conclusionThis study demonstrated lower Doppler velocimetry and impedance parameters and higher intraocular pressure among preeclampsia cases compared with controls. Abnormal funduscopic findings were observed in a few preeclamptic women and none among the controls. Ophthalmic artery Doppler parameters could be useful in identifying those women who are likely to suffer preeclampsia and its complications.

Indexed as

epidemiologyintraocular pressurevision

Identifiers

PMID32984544
PMCPMC7488785
OpenAlexW3085989384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.