ReviewGynecologic oncology reports2020
Twenty-first century radical hysterectomy - Journey from descriptive to practical anatomy.
Review in Gynecologic oncology reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interim analysis of robot-assisted radical hysterectomy in Japan: a multicenter, prospective interventional single-arm clinical trial.BMC cancer · 2024Trial
- Article
- Surgical Anatomy and Dissection of the Hypogastric Plexus in Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Review
- Pneumovaginoscopy-assisted radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: a novel bidirectional approach for tumor spillage prevention and R0 resection.Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2023Observational
- Radical Hysterectomy in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: Abandoning the One-Fits-All Concept.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Review
- New classification system for radical rectal cancer surgery based on membrane anatomy.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2023Article
- A Review on the Etiology, Prevention, and Management of Ureteral Injuries During Obstetric and Gynecologic Surgeries.International journal of women's health · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The resulting characteristics of 20th century radical hysterectomy demonstrated that, in the quest for a radical cure, its surgical procedure became extended. The consequences of this were increased difficulty in the procedure with risk of massive hemorrhage and vesical and anorectal dysfunction. Moreover, the cardinal and transverse cervical ligaments, which were individually recognized during the 19th century, became regarded as synonymous during the middle of the 20th century. Because of this, traditional surgical procedures such as Wertheim and Latzko's were not precisely followed, further delaying the advent of a new idea(s) for radical hysterectomy. The desired goal for 21st radical hysterectomy should be an anatomy and operative procedure that clarify and rectify these aforementioned negative surgical outcomes. In 1998, International Federation of Associations of Anatomists (IFAA) introduced clinical terminology in Terminologia Anatomica. With the IFAA's decision in mind, the author focused, out of the many theories and surgical procedures for cancer of the uterine cervix, on three noteworthy proposals. From these proposals, the possibility for a new idea(s) on theories and surgical procedures was explored through the fusion of anatomy and clinical practice. The idea for a new procedure(s) required a morphological distinction between description in textbooks and intraoperative findings, that is: a) a traditional anatomy that was based on gross/systemic anatomy; and b) an anatomy in which part of an artifact resulting from applying an artificial maneuver to a living body could be regarded as surgical anatomy. The author has tentatively called the former descriptive anatomy and the latter practical anatomy. The development of this practical anatomy led to the idea for and practical application of a less-extirpating and nerve-sparing operation, which improved patient's outcome. Radical hysterectomy of the 21st century should be conducted following this new anatomy that is concentrated around practical anatomy and independent from descriptive anatomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.