ArticleEuropean journal of radiology open2020
Interobserver agreement for the direct and indirect signs of pulmonary embolism evaluated using contrast enhanced magnetic angiography.
Article in European journal of radiology open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multimodality imaging of acute and chronic pulmonary thromboembolic disease.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccurate diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) using contrast enhanced MRA (CE-MRA) requires awareness of both the direct and indirect findings of PE. PURPOSE: To evaluate reader agreement of the direct and indirect findings of PE on CE-MRA.
methodsWe evaluated pulmonary artery diameter, right ventricle/left ventricle ratio, and clot/vessel lumen signal intensity ratio. Also, eight direct and eight indirect findings of PE were interpreted twice by two radiologists with different experience levels. The prevalence, and intra- and inter-reader agreement for the direct and indirect findings of PE were recorded. Statistical analysis of the measurements was assessed using intraclass correlation while Cohen's kappa test determined inter- and intra-reader agreement.
resultsWe reviewed 66 positive CE-MRA exams, 10 of which cases were used for training. The largest PE for each of the remaining 56 cases (40 woman) were included in this analysis (38.9 ± 19.7 (mean age (years) ± S.D.)). The highest interobserver agreement for the direct findings were vessel cutoff (κ = 0.52, 95 % CI = (0.30, 0.74), p < .0001) and bright clot (κ = 0.51, 95 % CI = (0.26, 0.78), p = .0001). The highest interobserver agreement for the indirect findings were for atelectasis (κ = 0.67, 95 % CI = (0.49, 0.87), p < .0001), pleural effusions (κ = 0.56, 95 % CI = (0.32, 0.79), p = 0001) and blank slate sing (κ = 0.56, 95 % CI = (0.18, 0.94), p < .0001).
conclusionThe indirect findings of atelectasis and pleural effusion had better interobserver reproducibility than the direct findings of vessel cutoff and bright clot. The intraobserver reproducibility of the direct and indirect findings is dependent on experience level. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Using contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism, the indirect findings of atelectasis and pleural effusion had better interobserver reproducibility than the direct findings of vessel cutoff and bright clot.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.