ReviewOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2020
Outcome Measures After Shoulder Stabilization in the Athletic Population: A Systematic Review of Clinical and Patient-Reported Metrics.
Review in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Trends in reported outcomes and patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in humeral shaft fracture literature: a systematic review.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024Pooled it
- High Rates of Return to Sport After Surgical Stabilization for Anterior Shoulder Instability in Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Review
- Psychological factors influencing return to sport after shoulder stabilization: assessment tools and intervention strategies-a narrative review.Annals of joint · 2026Review
- The relationship between subjective shoulder discomfort and quantitative humeral head translation in baseball players; cross-sectional study.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Validation of Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia in patients with shoulder instability.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Article
- Deficits in Upper Limb Long Lever Isometric Force After Shoulder Stabilization Surgery in Australian Rules Footballers.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2025Article
- Experiences of Female Rugby Union Players and Practitioners in Rehabilitation Following a Shoulder Injury.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The supine moving apprehension test-Reliability and validity among healthy individuals and patients with anterior shoulder instability.Shoulder & elbow · 2024Article
- A modified Delphi study to identify which items should be evaluated in shoulder instability research: a first step in developing a core outcome set.JSES international · 2023Article
- A new self-assessment tool following shoulder stabilization surgery, the auto-Walch and auto-Rowe questionnaires.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023Article
- Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic shoulder and elbow score in Finnish-speaking overhead athletes.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAthletic endeavor can require the "athletic shoulder" to tolerate significant load through supraphysiological range and often under considerable repetition. Outcome measures are valuable when determining an athlete's safe return to sport. Few data are available to guide a clinician's choice from the variety of measures available. PURPOSE: To describe the use of quantifiable objective outcome measures and patient-reported outcome tools after glenohumeral joint stabilization, specifically in an athletic population. The secondary aim of our study was to assess whether the method of measurement used was clearly described and standardized to aid clinical interpretation. STUDY
designSystematic review; Level of evidence, 4.
methodsA systematic search of MEDLINE, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science databases was performed in December 2018 based on the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. After the application of selection criteria, a full review of identified papers, and screening of reference lists, a total of 62 studies were included in the review. All studies were independently appraised for quality, predefined data fields were populated and cross-checked for accuracy, and results were then summarized from these data fields.
resultsOf the 62 included studies, 94% used a quantifiable objective clinical outcome. A majority (85%) of the studies measured range of motion, 21% recorded muscle strength, 5% measured electromyographic activity, 5% examined shoulder kinematics, and 3% assessed joint proprioception after surgery. However, only 18% of the studies clearly described a standardized method of measuring the outcome. Nearly all (95%) of the studies used at least 1 patient-reported outcome measure. The Rowe score was most commonly used (35%).
conclusionWe must standardize and clearly describe the use of quantifiable objective outcome measures to aid clinical interpretation. A concerted effort should also be made to standardize the use of patient-reported outcome tools after shoulder stabilization in the athletic population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.