ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2020
Minimum 10-Year Outcomes After Revision Anatomic Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction for Acromioclavicular Joint Instability.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Chronic acromioclavicular dislocations repaired by modified Weaver-Dunn technique with two EndoButtons: retrospective review of twenty three cases.International orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Acromioclavicular joint stabilization using autologous biceps for horizontal neutralization technique in the revision setting of acromioclavicular joint stabilization using autologous biceps.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2026Article
- Low short-term complication rates following acromioclavicular joint surgery: a large database study.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2026Article
- Risk factors for coracoclavicular reconstruction failure: a systematic review.JSES international · 2025Review
- Minimum 10-year outcomes after arthroscopically assisted anatomic coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction for the treatment of type III and V acromioclavicular joint injuries.JSES international · 2025Article
- Capsular Reconstruction of the Acromioclavicular Joint With a Fascia Lata Autograft: The Wrap Technique.Arthroscopy techniques · 2025Article
- Acromioclavicular Reconstruction Using the Lockdown Technique: A Case Series and Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Clavicular tunnel widening in chronic acromioclavicular joint instabilities after primary versus revision arthroscopically-assisted acromio- and coracoclavicular stabilization.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2024Article
- Failed suspension button acromioclavicular joint reconstruction revised with double-loop suture cerclage: a case report and review of the literature.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2023Article
- Iatrogenic instability of the acromioclavicular joint leads to ongoing impairment of shoulder function even following secondary surgical stabilization.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2023Article
- Current concepts in acromioclavicular joint (AC) instability - a proposed treatment algorithm for acute and chronic AC-joint surgery.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRevision surgery in cases of previously failed primary acromioclavicular (AC) joint stabilization remains challenging mainly because of anatomic alterations or technical difficulties. However, anatomic coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction (ACCR) has been shown to achieve encouraging biomechanical, clinical, and radiographic short-term to midterm results. PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical and radiographic long-term outcomes of patients undergoing revision ACCR after failed operative treatment for type III through V AC joint injuries with a minimum 10-year follow-up. STUDY
designCase series; Level of evidence, 4.
methodsA retrospective chart review was performed on prospectively collected data within an institutional shoulder registry. Patients who underwent revision ACCR for type III through V AC joint injuries between January 2003 and December 2009 were analyzed. Clinical outcome measures included the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Simple Shoulder Test (SST), and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE). The coracoclavicular distance (CCD) was measured for radiographic analysis immediately postoperatively and at last postoperative follow-up.
resultsA total of 8 patients with a mean age at the time of surgery of 44.6 ± 10.6 years and a mean follow-up of 135.0 ± 17.4 months (range, 120-167 months) were eligible for inclusion in the study. The time from initial AC joint stabilization until revision surgery was 10.2 ± 12.4 months (range, 0.5-36 months); 62.5% of the patients had undergone more than 2 previous AC joint surgical procedures. The ASES score improved from 43.9 ± 22.4 preoperatively to 80.6 ± 28.8 postoperatively (
conclusionPatients undergoing revision ACCR after failed operative treatment for type III through V AC joint injuries maintained significant improvement in clinical outcomes at a minimum 10-year follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.