Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32984421›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2020

Minimum 10-Year Outcomes After Revision Anatomic Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction for Acromioclavicular Joint Instability.

Daniel P Berthold, Lukas N Muench, Knut Beitzel, Simon Archambault, Aulon Jerliu, Mark P Cote, Bastian Scheiderer, Andreas B Imhoff, Robert A Arciero, Augustus D Mazzocca

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniel P BertholdDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Connecticut, Farmington, Connecticut, USA.
Lukas N MuenchDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Connecticut, Farmington, Connecticut, USA.
Knut BeitzelDepartment of Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Simon ArchambaultDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Connecticut, Farmington, Connecticut, USA.
Aulon JerliuDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Connecticut, Farmington, Connecticut, USA.
Mark P CoteDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Connecticut, Farmington, Connecticut, USA.
Bastian ScheidererDepartment of Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Andreas B ImhoffDepartment of Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Robert A ArcieroDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Connecticut, Farmington, Connecticut, USA.
Augustus D MazzoccaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Connecticut, Farmington, Connecticut, USA.
University of Connecticut · USTechnical University of Munich · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRevision surgery in cases of previously failed primary acromioclavicular (AC) joint stabilization remains challenging mainly because of anatomic alterations or technical difficulties. However, anatomic coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction (ACCR) has been shown to achieve encouraging biomechanical, clinical, and radiographic short-term to midterm results. PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical and radiographic long-term outcomes of patients undergoing revision ACCR after failed operative treatment for type III through V AC joint injuries with a minimum 10-year follow-up. STUDY

designCase series; Level of evidence, 4.

methodsA retrospective chart review was performed on prospectively collected data within an institutional shoulder registry. Patients who underwent revision ACCR for type III through V AC joint injuries between January 2003 and December 2009 were analyzed. Clinical outcome measures included the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Simple Shoulder Test (SST), and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE). The coracoclavicular distance (CCD) was measured for radiographic analysis immediately postoperatively and at last postoperative follow-up.

resultsA total of 8 patients with a mean age at the time of surgery of 44.6 ± 10.6 years and a mean follow-up of 135.0 ± 17.4 months (range, 120-167 months) were eligible for inclusion in the study. The time from initial AC joint stabilization until revision surgery was 10.2 ± 12.4 months (range, 0.5-36 months); 62.5% of the patients had undergone more than 2 previous AC joint surgical procedures. The ASES score improved from 43.9 ± 22.4 preoperatively to 80.6 ± 28.8 postoperatively (

conclusionPatients undergoing revision ACCR after failed operative treatment for type III through V AC joint injuries maintained significant improvement in clinical outcomes at a minimum 10-year follow-up.

Indexed as

ACCRAC jointacromioclavicular joint injuryanatomic coracoclavicular ligament reconstructionrevision

Identifiers

PMID32984421
PMCPMC7498980
OpenAlexW3087174799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.