Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32984366›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2020

Can Psychophysics Be Fun? Exploring the Feasibility of a Gamified Contrast Sensitivity Function Measure in Amblyopic Children Aged 4-9 Years.

Doaa Elfadaly, Sahar Torky Abdelrazik, Peter B M Thomas, Tessa M Dekker, Annegret Dahlmann-Noor, Pete R Jones

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Digital health and wearable devices for retinal disease monitoring.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Doaa ElfadalyMoorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Sahar Torky AbdelrazikDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Minia University, Minia, Egypt.
Peter B M ThomasMoorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Tessa M DekkerChild Vision Laboratory, Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London (UCL), London, United Kingdom.
Annegret Dahlmann-NoorMoorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Pete R JonesNIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Ophthalmology, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom.
University College London · GBMinia University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Routine assessments of the Contrast Sensitivity Function [CSF] could be useful for the diagnosis and monitoring of amblyopia. However, current CSF measures are not clinically practical, as they are too slow, too boring, and too uncomfortable to sustain a young child's interest. Here we assess the feasibility of a more gamified approach to CSF testing, in which a maximum likelihood psychophysical algorithm (QUEST+) is combined with a largely unconstrained user interface (no fixation target, head restraints, or discrete trials). Twenty-five amblyopes (strabismic, anisometropic, or mixed) aged 4.0-9.2 years performed the gamified CSF assessment monocularly (once per eye). The test required the child to "pop" (press) grating stimuli as they "bounced" around a tablet screen. Head tracking via the tablet's front-facing camera was used to adjust for variations in viewing distance

Indexed as

amblyopiachildrencontrast sensitivity functiongaborOpenFacepsychophysicsQUEST+quick CSF

Identifiers

PMID32984366
PMCPMC7480072
OpenAlexW3080414710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.