Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32984048›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2020

Improving Structure Delineation for Radiation Therapy Planning Using Dual-Energy CT.

George Noid, Justin Zhu, An Tai, Nilesh Mistry, Diane Schott, Douglas Prah, Eric Paulson, Christopher Schultz, X Allen Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

George NoidDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States.
Justin ZhuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States.
An TaiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States.
Nilesh MistrySiemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc., Malvern, PA, United States.
Diane SchottDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States.
Douglas PrahDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States.
Eric PaulsonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States.
Christopher SchultzDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States.
X Allen LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe present the advantages of using dual-energy CT (DECT) for radiation therapy (RT) planning based on our clinical experience.

methodsDECT data acquired for 20 representative patients of different tumor sites and/or clinical situations with dual-source simultaneous scanning (Drive, Siemens) and single-source sequential scanning (Definition, Siemens) using 80 and 140-kVp X-ray beams were analyzed. The data were used to derive iodine maps, fat maps, and mono-energetic images (MEIs) from 40 to 190 keV to exploit the energy dependence of X-ray attenuation. The advantages of using these DECT-derived images for RT planning were investigated.

resultsWhen comparing 40 keV MEIs to conventional 120-kVp CT, soft tissue contrast between the duodenum and pancreatic head was enhanced by a factor of 2.8. For a cholangiocarcinoma patient, contrast between tumor and surrounding tissue was increased by 96 HU and contrast-to-noise ratio was increased by up to 60% for 40 keV MEIs compared to conventional CT. Simultaneous dual-source DECT also preserved spatial resolution in comparison to sequential DECT as evidenced by the identification of vasculature in a pancreas patient. Volume of artifacts for five patients with titanium implants was reduced by over 95% for 190 keV MEIs compared to 120-kVp CT images. A 367-cm

conclusionThe use of DECT for RT simulation offers clinically meaningful advantages through improved simulation workflow and enhanced structure delineation for RT planning.

Indexed as

dual-energy CTimage contrastmetal artifactsmono-energetic imagemotion artifactsphoton starvationradiation oncologyradiation therapy

Identifiers

PMID32984048
PMCPMC7484725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.