Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32983913›Full record

ArticleAnnals of global health2020

Factors Associated with Loss to Follow-up among Cervical Cancer Patients in Rwanda.

Placide Habinshuti, Marc Hagenimana, Cam Nguyen, Paul H Park, Tharcisse Mpunga, Lawrence N Shulman, Alexandra Fehr, Gilbert Rukundo, Jean Bosco Bigirimana, Stephanie Teeple and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of global health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Predictors of loss to follow-up after radiotherapy in cancer patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Placide HabinshutiPartners in Health/Inshuti Mu Buzima, RW.
Marc HagenimanaRwanda Biomedical Center/Non-Communicable Diseases division, RW.
Cam NguyenPartners in Health/Inshuti Mu Buzima, RW.
Paul H ParkPartners in Health/Boston, US.
Tharcisse MpungaMinistry of Health/Butaro Hospital, RW.
Lawrence N ShulmanUniversity of Pennsylvania, US.
Alexandra FehrPartners in Health/Inshuti Mu Buzima, RW.
Gilbert RukundoPartners in Health/Inshuti Mu Buzima, RW.
Jean Bosco BigirimanaPartners in Health/Inshuti Mu Buzima, RW.
Stephanie TeepleUniversity of Pennsylvania, US.
Catherine KigonyaPartners in Health/Inshuti Mu Buzima, RW.
Gilles Francois NdayisabaRwanda Biomedical Center/Non-Communicable Diseases division, RW.
Francois UwinkindiRwanda Biomedical Center/Non-Communicable Diseases division, RW.
Thomas RandallHarvard Medical School, US.
Ann C MillerHarvard Medical School, US.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cervical cancer is among the most common cancers affecting women globally. Where treatment is available in low- and middle-income countries, many women become lost to follow-up (LTFU) at various points of care. Objective: This study assessed predictors of LTFU among cervical cancer patients in rural Rwanda. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of cervical cancer patients enrolled at Butaro Cancer Center of Excellence (BCCOE) between 2012 and 2017 who were either alive and in care or LTFU at 12 months after enrollment. Patients are considered early LTFU if they did not return to clinic after the first visit and late LTFU if they did not return to clinic after the second visit. We conducted two multivariable logistic regressions to determine predictors of early and late LTFU. Findings: Of 652 patients in the program, 312 women met inclusion criteria, of whom 47 (15.1%) were early LTFU, 78 (25.0%) were late LTFU and 187 (59.9%) were alive and in care. In adjusted analyses, patients with no documented disease stage at presentation were more likely to be early LTFU vs. patients with stage 1 and 2 when controlling for other factors (aOR: 14.93, 95% CI 6.12-36.43). Patients who travel long distances (aOR: 2.25, 95% CI 1.11, 4.53), with palliative care as type of treatment received (aOR: 6.65, CI 2.28, 19.40) and patients with missing treatment (aOR: 7.99, CI 3.56, 17.97) were more likely to be late LTFU when controlling for other factors. Patients with ECOG status of 2 and higher were less likely to be late LTFU (aOR: 0.26, 95% CI 0.08, 0.85). Conclusion: Different factors were associated with early and later LTFU. Enhanced patient education, mechanisms to facilitate diagnosis at early stages of disease, and strategies that improve patient tracking and follow-up may reduce LTFU and improve patient retention.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsUterine Cervical NeoplasmsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLost to Follow-UpRetrospective StudiesRwanda

Identifiers

PMID32983913
PMCPMC7500245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.