ReviewJournal of oral biology and craniofacial research
3D bioprinting and craniofacial regeneration.
Review in Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tissue engineering driven regeneration in oral squamous cell carcinoma: from biomaterials to precision gene editing.Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute · 2026Review
- Physical and Mechanical Characterisation of 3D-Bioprinted Hydrogels for Dental Applications: A Scoping Review.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- 3D-printed living implants: advancing cranial reconstruction.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Article
- Possible Diagnostic and Therapeutic Applications of Bioprinting for Bone Regeneration in Maxillofacial Surgery.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Patient-Specific Implants in Maxillo-Facial Reconstruction: Current Practices and Way Forward-An Overview of Systematic Reviews.Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery · 2025Review
- Emerging Trends in Microfluidic Biomaterials: From Functional Design to Applications.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
- The Properties and Applicability of Bioprinting in the Field of Maxillofacial Surgery.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Three-Dimensional Bioprinting for Retinal Tissue Engineering.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Applications of 3D Bioprinting in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: An Insight.Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery · 2024Review
- Unlocking 3D printing technology for microalgal production and application.Advanced biotechnology · 2024Review
- 3D Bioprinting Techniques and Bioinks for Periodontal Tissues Regeneration-A Literature Review.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Three-Dimensional Bioprinting: A Comprehensive Review for Applications in Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Recent Developments in Bio-Ink Formulations Using Marine-Derived Biomaterials for Three-Dimensional (3D) Bioprinting.Marine drugs · 2024Review
- Nanomechanical Mapping of Three Dimensionally Printed Poly-ε-Caprolactone Single Microfibers at the Cell Scale for Bone Tissue Engineering Applications.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Advancing Dentistry through Bioprinting: Personalization of Oral Tissues.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023Review
- 3D Bioprinting in Otolaryngology: A Review.Advanced healthcare materials · 2023Review
- Analysis of the Robotic-Based In Situ Bioprinting Workflow for the Regeneration of Damaged Tissues through a Case Study.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Hydrogels-A Promising Materials for 3D Printing Technology.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- 3D Bioprinting Technology and Hydrogels Used in the Process.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2022Review
- The Potential of Polyethylene Terephthalate Glycol as Biomaterial for Bone Tissue Engineering.Polymers · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundConsidering the structural and functional complexity of the craniofacial tissues, 3D bioprinting can be a valuable tool to design and create functional 3D tissues or organs in situ for
methodElectronic database searches were undertaken on pubmed, google scholar, medline, embase, and science direct for english language literature, published for 3D bioprinting in craniofacial regeneration. The search items used were 'craniofacial regeneration' OR 'jaw regeneration' OR 'maxillofacial regeneration' AND '3D bioprinting' OR 'three dimensional bioprinting' OR 'Additive manufacturing' OR 'rapid prototyping' OR 'patient specific bioprinting'. Reviews and duplicates were excluded.
resultsSearch with above described criteria yielded 476 articles, which reduced to 108 after excluding reviews. Further screening of individual articles led to 77 articles to which 9 additional articles were included from references, and 18 duplicate articles were excluded. Finally we were left with 68 articles to be included in the review.
conclusionCraniofacial tissue and organ regeneration has been reported a success using bioink with different biomaterial and incorporated stem cells in 3D bioprinters. Though several attempts have been made to fabricate craniofacial bone and cartilage, the strive to achieve desired outcome still continues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.