Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32983845›Full record

ReviewJournal of bone and joint infection2020

Diagnosing pelvic osteomyelitis in patients with pressure ulcers: a systematic review comparing bone histology with alternative diagnostic modalities.

Maria Chicco, Prashant Singh, Younatan Beitverda, Gillian Williams, Hassan Hirji, Guduru Gopal Rao

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of bone and joint infection, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prehabilitation for Pressure Ulcer Surgery: A Practical and Evidence-based Guide.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Insights intoInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maria ChiccoDepartment of Microbiology, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, Northwick Park Hospital, Harrow, HA1 3UJ, UK.
Prashant SinghDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, Barnet Hospital, Barnet, EN5 3DJ, UK.
Younatan BeitverdaDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, Northwick Park Hospital, Harrow, HA1 3UJ, UK.
Gillian WilliamsDepartment of Cellular Pathology, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, Northwick Park Hospital, Harrow, HA1 3UJ, UK.
Hassan HirjiDepartment of Radiology, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, Northwick Park Hospital, Harrow, HA1 3UJ, UK.
Guduru Gopal RaoDepartment of Microbiology, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, Northwick Park Hospital, Harrow, HA1 3UJ, UK.
London North West Healthcare NHS Trust · GBRoyal Free London NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate diagnosis of osteomyelitis underlying pressure ulcers is essential, as overdiagnosis exposes patients to unnecessary and prolonged antibiotic therapy, while failure to diagnose prevents successful treatment. Histopathological examination of bone biopsy specimens is the diagnostic gold standard. Bone biopsy can be an invasive procedure, and, for this reason, other diagnostic modalities are commonly used. However, their accuracy is questioned in literature. This systematic review aims to assess accuracy of various modalities (clinical, microbiological and radiological) for the diagnosis of pelvic osteomyelitis in patients with pressure ulcers as compared to the gold standard. A systematic literature search was conducted in July 2019 using the MEDLINE (Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System - MEDLARS - Online) and CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) databases. The search terms were "decubitus ulcer", "pressure ulcer", "pressure sore", "bedsore" and "osteomyelitis". The inclusion criteria were original full-text articles in English comparing the results of bone histology with those of other diagnostic modalities in adult patients with pelvic pressure ulcers. Six articles were included in the systematic review. Clinical diagnosis was found to be neither specific nor sensitive. Microbiological examination, and in particular cultures of bone biopsy specimens, displayed high sensitivity but low specificity, likely reflecting contamination. Radiological imaging in the form of X-ray and CT (computed tomography) scans displayed high specificity but low sensitivity. MRI (magnetic resonance imaging), bone scanning and indium-labelled scintigraphy displayed high sensitivity but low specificity. Our systematic review did not find any diagnostic method (clinical, microbiological or radiological) to be reliable in the diagnosis of pelvic osteomyelitis associated with pressure ulcers as compared to bone histology.

Identifiers

PMID32983845
PMCPMC7517666
OpenAlexW3081505686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.