ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2020
An Innovative Autologous Breast Reconstruction Option: Musculo-derma-glandular, Axio-perforator, Bipedicled Flap.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Simultaneous Breast and Nipple-Areolar Reconstruction Using Musculo-derma-glandular, Axio-perforator, Bipedicled Flap.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Following a mastectomy, patients frequently seek breast reconstruction. Although there are several options for reconstruction, none of them are considered ideal. Taking patients' psychological and physical condition into account, we created a new flap technique with a low postoperative morbidity and short operation time. We harvested the flap composed of skin, breast tissue, and pectoralis major muscle with a base in the parasternal line from the contralateral breast. To display our results, we presented 2 case examples. The mean follow-up was 12 months, and no postoperative complications were observed. At follow-ups, patients answered the question, "How satisfied are you with the results of the surgery?" using a 5-point Likert-like scale (5, very satisfied; 4, somewhat satisfied; 3, undecided; 2, somewhat dissatisfied; and 1, very dissatisfied). The mean score was 4. Our study showed that this surgical approach is a safe and cost-effective alternative for immediate and delayed breast reconstruction.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.