ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2020
Perceptions of Quality of Life among Face Transplant Recipients: A Qualitative Content Analysis.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reassessing Ethical Considerations in Pediatric Facial Transplantation: Where Are We Now?Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Is There an Increasing Interest in Vascular Composite Allotransplantation? A Search Trends Analysis.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Navigating Privacy in Facial Transplantation: Ethical Considerations and Institutional Strategies.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Full-spectrum cannabis extracts for women with chronic pain syndromes: a real-life retrospective report of multi-symptomatic benefits after treatment with individually tailored dosage schemes.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Incorporating Trauma-informed Approaches to Care in Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2024Article
- The role of the purposeful shared decision making model in vascularized composite allotransplantation.Frontiers in transplantation · 2024Article
- Inconvenience and adaptation in Japanese adult achondroplasia and hypochondroplasia: A cross-sectional study.Clinical pediatric endocrinology : case reports and clinical investigations : official journal of the Japanese Society for Pediatric Endocrinology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of facial transplantation (FT) was to enhance quality of life (QoL) for individuals living with severe facial disfigurement. Yet QoL has proved challenging to assess, as the field lacks a unified approach for incorporating FT recipients' perspectives into meaningful QoL measures. In this study, we review FT recipients' self-reported QoL through a qualitative analysis of publicly available posttransplant interviews to identify the aspects of QoL they report as meaningful.
methodsA conventional qualitative content analysis was conducted through a comprehensive review of publicly available interviews with FT recipients. Data sources included English language audio, video, and online print interviews from 2008 to 2019. Recipient interview data were obtained for both partial and full FT recipients located in North America through Google and YouTube searches. Audio and video interviews were transcribed, and an inductive content analysis was used to develop and apply a coding scheme to all interview transcripts. Codes were subsequently grouped into categories and interpreted into themes.
resultsIn total, 81 interviews representing 12 North American, English-speaking face transplant recipients were collected from internet sources, of which 74 interviews remained after exclusion criteria were applied. Three themes emerged representing the dimensions of QoL emphasized by FT recipients: (1) reconstitution and re-embodiment of physical/corporeal selfhood, (2) integrity of cognitive/emotional selfhood, and (3) social selfhood and the importance of social integration.
conclusionsThis study provides an insight into North American FT recipients' experiences, values, and goals and illuminates critical aspects of QoL that are meaningful to this unique patient population, which may not be fully captured by currently available assessment tools. The themes developed in this study link facets of QoL to the overall significance of embodied selfhood among FT recipients and will help inform the future development of FT-specific patient-reported QoL outcome measures.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.