ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2020
Multimodal Radiofrequency Application for Lower Face and Neck Laxity.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Comparative Efficacy of Adjuvant Technologies for Skin Tightening in Liposuction: A Systematic Review and Quantitative Analysis.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- A Systematic Review of Subsurface Radiofrequency Treatments in Plastic Surgery.Annals of plastic surgery · 2022Pooled it
- The STIIM UP Protocol: Exploratory Evaluation of the Potential of Combined Calcium Hydroxyapatite, Hyaluronic Acid, and Botulinum Toxin A in Neck Rejuvenation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Institutional Review Board Approval of Plastic Surgery Studies: Why It Matters.Annals of plastic surgery · 2026Article
- Topical Recombinant Collagen Following Fractional Radio Frequency Microneedling for Nonsurgical Facelift: Case Report.JMIR dermatology · 2026Article
- Ligament-Focused Advanced Monopolar Radiofrequency: A New Approach to Face and Neck Skin Laxity.Cureus · 2026Article
- Navigating the Intersection of Radiofrequency Microneedling and Surgical Facelifts: Scoping Review.JMIR dermatology · 2026Article
- Neck Lift After Nonsurgical Treatments: Fibrosis, Fat Loss, and Surgical Complexity.Aesthetic surgery journal · 2026Article
- Novel Minimally Invasive Mastoid Sling for a Nonsurgical Neck Lift: A Combination of Liposuction, Thermal Energy, and Suture Suspension for Neck Rejuvenation.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2026Article
- Assessment of dual-fusion-radiofrequency effects on cheek dermis and fascia elasticity using elastography.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Low-energy Morpheus8 and Nanofat Grafting for Compartment-specific Facial Rejuvenation: Selective Fat Remodeling and Skin Quality Enhancement.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025Article
- Microfocused Ultrasound in Regenerative Aesthetics: A Narrative Review on Mechanisms of Action and Clinical Outcomes.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2025Review
- The Role of Fractional Radiofrequency in Long-term Acne Remission and Reduction of Acne Scar Load.Aesthetic surgery journal · 2025Article
- An Anatomical Approach to Radiofrequency-Assisted Facial Rejuvenation: Beyond the Treatment Gap.Aesthetic surgery journal · 2025Article
- Radiofrequency for Facial & Neck Rejuvenation: A Bibliometric Analysis.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2025Review
- Invited Discussion on "Cone-Beam Computed Tomography for Objective Diagnosis of Age-Related Soft Tissue Changes in Lower Face and Neck".Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2023Article
- Conflict of Interest and Plastic Surgery Journal Editors: The Problem and the Solution.Annals of plastic surgery · 2023Article
- Ancillary Procedures to Facelift Surgery: What has Changed?Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2023Review
- The MICRO-Lift: A Ligaments-Based Anatomic Technique for Lower Face and Neck Rejuvenation Using Bipolar Radiofrequency.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2022Article
- Two-stage Radiofrequency-assisted Lipoabdominoplasty.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nonexcisional facial skin tightening has long been an elusive goal in aesthetic surgery. The "treatment gap" includes cases who are not "severe" enough for excisions surgery but not "mild" enough for most traditional noninvasive aesthetic modalities. In this retrospective review, we present the largest evaluation to date of radiofrequency (RF) skin tightening technology combination including bipolar RF (FaceTite; InMode) and fractional bipolar RF (Fractora modified to Morpheus8; InMode).
methodsA multicenter retrospective study was conducted between January 2013 and December 2018 using a combination of bipolar RF and fractional bipolar RF for the treatment of facial aging. Data collection included demographic information, Baker Face/Neck Classification, amount of energy used, adverse events, and patient satisfaction. Four cadaver dissections were also conducted to correlate the underlying neuromuscular anatomy with RF treatment of the lower face and neck.
resultsTwo hundred forty-seven patients (234 women and 13 men) were included in the study. Average age was 55.1 years (SD, ±8), body mass index was 24.3 (±2.4), and 9% (23/247) of patients were active smokers at the time of treatment. Patients had an average Baker Face/Neck Classification score of 3.1 (SD, ±1.4). The procedure was performed under local anesthesia in 240/247 cases (97.2%). Patients objectively improved their Baker Face/Neck Classification score by 1.4 points (SD, ±1.1). Ninety-three percent of patients indicated that they were pleased with their results and would undergo the procedure again. Complications recorded for our cohort included prolonged swelling >6 weeks (4.8%, 12/247), hardened area >12 weeks (3.2%, 8/247), and marginal mandibular neuropraxia (1.2%, 3/247), which all resolved without further intervention. When considering possible control variables, age seems to be a significant factor. That is, older patients were more likely to benefit from a larger magnitude of the treatment effect (as demonstrated by a decrease in the Baker rating from pre- to posttreatment) when compared with younger patients. However, both groups did demonstrate significant improvements across time.
conclusionWhile this combination RF treatment (FaceTite bipolar RF and fractional bipolar RF) does not aim to replace a facelift/necklift in appropriate candidates, it does broaden the plastic surgeons' armamentarium to potentially fill a treatment gap.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.