ArticleCureus2020
The Current State of Clinical Trials Studying Hydrocephalus: An Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov.
Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Why are clinical trials of deep brain stimulation terminated? An analysis of clinicaltrials.gov.World neurosurgery: X · 2024Article
- Quantitative imaging features predict spinal tap response in normal pressure hydrocephalus.Neuroradiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Hydrocephalus is a significant public health concern estimated to affect 380,000 new individuals annually. In addition, it exhibits an increasingly high financial burden for the healthcare industry. Clinical trials are the gold standard for evaluating preventative and therapeutic strategies to bring potential treatments to the forefront of clinical practice. Methods A study of the ClinicalTrials.gov was conducted in April 2019 to examine all current and previously reported clinical trials studying hydrocephalus. Studies were reviewed to extrapolate information to characterize the current state of research being conducted for hydrocephalus. Results In total, 80 clinical trials met inclusion criteria and were analyzed: 48.8% were observation and 51.2% were interventional. Of those, 55% have been completed while 30.0% are still recruiting, and 15.0% are not yet recruiting. The United States has the most clinical trials (42.0%) and a plurality of trials has a sample size of 0-50 participants. The majority of studies included only adults (53.8%). Of those studies, 54.0% were cohort and the majority were prospective (74.0%). Of the different types of hydrocephalus, normal pressure hydrocephalus and pediatric hydrocephalus have generated the most interest for research comprising a majority of the clinical trial registry. While 44 of the trials are complete, only 20 have published results in peer-reviewed literature highlighting the need for improvement in publishing study results even if the results of the trials are null. Conclusion Most clinical trials to date have pertained to the treatment of normal pressure hydrocephalus and pediatric hydrocephalus. While great advancements have been made for the treatment of hydrocephalus, there remains much room for improvements in therapeutic interventional modalities as well as ensuring the reporting of all undertaken clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.