ArticleCureus2020
Impact of Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on Complete Atrioventricular Block With Acute Inferior ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.
Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Can prolonged P-R interval predict clinical outcomes in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome patients?BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aims Complete atrioventricular block (CAVB) is associated with poor clinical outcomes in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). This study determined the frequency and outcomes of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) in patients with CAVB with acute inferior STEMI. Methods We conducted an observational, prospective study and enrolled 151 patients who were diagnosed with inferior STEMI. All patients received PPCI. The clinical outcomes were compared in patients with and without CAVB. The data was recorded on a collection form and analyzed on Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software. Descriptive statistics were applied. For quantitative variables, standard deviation and mean were obtained, and statistical tests were also applied. Results Baseline characteristics were homogeneous in all patients. Half of the study population was either diabetic or hypertensive. Out of 151 participants, 21 (13.9%) developed CAVB. Two-thirds of the patients, who had developed heart block, reverted after PPCI. After a follow-up of two weeks, in-hospital mortality did not differ between the groups. Conclusion We conclude that PPCI can improve outcomes of CAVB-complicated acute inferior STEMI and suggest that primary PCI should be the preferred reperfusion therapy in patients with CAVB with STEMI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.