ArticleCureus2020
Clinico-Pathological Study of K-ras Mutations in Colorectal Tumors: A Single-Center Retrospective Study of 51 Patients in Madinah, Saudi Arabia.
Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis on the Occurrence of Biomarker Mutation in Colorectal Cancer among the Asian Population.BioMed research international · 2022Pooled it
- Review
- Molecular pathology of colorectal cancer: The Saudi situation in perspective.Saudi medical journal · 2023Review
- Fecal gene detection based on next generation sequencing for colorectal cancer diagnosis.World journal of gastroenterology · 2022Article
- KRAS/NRAS/BRAF Mutation Rate in Saudi Academic Hospital Patients With Colorectal Cancer.Cureus · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the leading types of cancer worldwide and in Saudi Arabia. At the molecular level, CRC is very complicated and requires establishing comprehensive patient stratification models through identification of patients who will benefit or will not benefit from targeted therapy. We retrospectively investigated and analyzed the frequency of Kirsten-ras (K-ras) mutation and its correlation with patients' characteristics as weel as its association with clinicopathological features (i.e age, gender, clinical stage, anatomical site, histological subtype, degree of histological differentiation and metastatic site) in patients with CRC. Methods Medical records and paraffin-embedded tumor samples from 51 patients with histologically proven colorectal adenocarcinoma referred to Madinah center in Saudi Arabia were analyzed for the occurrence of rat sarcoma virus (RAS) mutations. Results RAS mutations occurred in 43% of the patients; 91% of these mutations were in K-ras. Seventy-five percent of these K-ras mutations were in codon 12, most commonly p.G12D. Codon 13 mutations occurred in 20% of tumors: all of these were p.G13D (100%). The percentage of K-ras mutations occurrence was higher in young patients (≤50) compared with the older patients (>50) (54.5% and 35%, respectively). Similarly, the percentage of K-ras mutations occurrence was higher in the right-sided tumors compared with the left-sided tumors (57.1% and 32.4%, respectively). Patients' characteristics and clinicopathological features were not significantly associated with K-ras mutations. Conclusions K-ras mutations are common among Saudi patients diagnosed with CRC in Madinah, especially pG12V and pG12D in codon 12. Further investigation would be required to establish correlation of K-ras mutations in larger cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.