Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32983573›Full record

ArticleBiomedical physics & engineering express2019

Towards an intuitive communication-BCI: decoding visually imagined characters from the early visual cortex using high-field fMRI.

Max A van den Boom, Mariska J Vansteensel, Melissa I Koppeschaar, Matthijs A H Raemaekers, Nick F Ramsey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical physics & engineering express, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Max A van den BoomDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5481-1659
Mariska J VansteenselDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Melissa I KoppeschaarDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Matthijs A H RaemaekersDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Nick F RamseyDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

European Research Council 320708
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain-computer interfaces aim to provide people with paralysis with the possibility to use their neural signals to control devices. For communication, most BCIs are based on the selection of letters from a (digital) letter board to spell words and sentences. Visual mental imagery of letters could offer a new, fast and intuitive way to spell in a BCI-communication solution. Here we provide a proof of concept for the decoding of visually imagined characters from the early visual cortex using 7 Tesla functional MRI. Sixteen healthy participants visually imagined three different characters for 3, 5 and 7 s in a slow event-related design. Using single-trial classification, we were able to decode the characters with an average accuracy of 54%, which is significantly above chance level (33%). Furthermore, the imagined characters were classifiable shortly after cue onset and remained classifiable with prolonged imagery. These properties, combined with the cortical location of the early visual cortex and its decodable activity, encourage further research on intracranial interfacing using surface electrodes to bring us closer to such a visual imagery based BCI communication solution.

Identifiers

PMID32983573
PMCPMC7116116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.