Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32983572›Full record

ReviewArchives of physiotherapy2020

Patients' perceptions with musculoskeletal disorders regarding their experience with healthcare providers and health services: an overview of reviews.

Alan Chi-Lun-Chiao, Mohammed Chehata, Kenneth Broeker, Brendan Gates, Leila Ledbetter, Chad Cook, Malene Ahern, Daniel I Rhon, Alessandra N Garcia

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Archives of physiotherapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Giving an account of patients' experience: A qualitative study on the care process of hip and knee osteoarthritis.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  14. Needs assessment for health service design for people with back pain in a hospital setting: A qualitative study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Alan Chi-Lun-ChiaoDuke Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Duke University Division of Physical Therapy, Durham, North Carolina USA.
Mohammed ChehataDuke Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Duke University Division of Physical Therapy, Durham, North Carolina USA.
Kenneth BroekerDuke Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Duke University Division of Physical Therapy, Durham, North Carolina USA.
Brendan GatesDuke Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Duke University Division of Physical Therapy, Durham, North Carolina USA.
Leila LedbetterDuke University Medical Center Library, Durham, North Carolina USA.
Chad CookDuke Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Duke University Division of Physical Therapy, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina USA.
Malene AhernUniversity of Wollongong, Australian Health Services Research Institute, Sydney, New South Wales Australia.
Daniel I RhonCenter for the Intrepid, Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, TX USA.
Alessandra N GarciaCollege of Pharmacy & Health Sciences, Physical Therapy Program, Lillington, North Carolina USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis overview of reviews aimed to identify (1) aspects of the patient experience when seeking care for musculoskeletal disorders from healthcare providers and the healthcare system, and (2) which mechanisms are used to measure aspects of the patient experience. DATA SOURCES: Four databases were searched from inception to December 20th, 2019. REVIEW

methodsSystematic or scoping reviews examining patient experience in seeking care for musculoskeletal from healthcare providers and the healthcare system were included. Independent authors screened and selected studies, extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality of the reviews. Patient experience concepts were compiled into five themes from a perspective of a)

resultsThirty reviews were included (18 systematic and 12 scoping reviews). Relational aspects were reported in 29 reviews and functional aspects in 25 reviews. For relational aspects, the most prevalent themes were "information needs" (education and explanation on diseases, symptoms, and self-management strategies) and "understanding patient expectations" (respect and empathy). For functional aspects, the most prevalent themes were patient's "physical and environmental needs," (cleanliness, safety, and accessibility of clinics), and "trusted expertise," (healthcare providers' competence and clinical skills to provide holistic care). Interviews were the most frequent mechanism identified to collect patient experience.

conclusionsMeasuring patient experience provides direct insights about the patient's perspectives and may help to promote better patient-centered health services and increase the quality of care. Areas of improvement identified were interpersonal skills of healthcare providers and logistics of health delivery, which may lead to a more desirable patient-perceived experience and thus better overall healthcare outcomes.

trial registration

Indexed as

HealthcareMusculoskeletal disorderPatient experienceSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID32983572
PMCPMC7517681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.