Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32983280›Full record

ReviewJournal of pharmaceutical innovation2022

An Elucidative Review to Analytically Sieve the Viability of Nanomedicine Market.

Anaida Kad, Archit Pundir, Shailendra Kumar Arya, Neha Bhardwaj, Madhu Khatri

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of pharmaceutical innovation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anaida KadDepartment of Biotechnology, University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Panjab University, Sector-25, Chandigarh, 160014 India.
Archit PundirDepartment of Biotechnology, University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Panjab University, Sector-25, Chandigarh, 160014 India.
Shailendra Kumar AryaDepartment of Biotechnology, University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Panjab University, Sector-25, Chandigarh, 160014 India.
Neha BhardwajDepartment of Biotechnology, University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Panjab University, Sector-25, Chandigarh, 160014 India.
Madhu KhatriDepartment of Biotechnology, University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Panjab University, Sector-25, Chandigarh, 160014 India.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The advent of the twenty-first century marked a paradigm shift in the healthcare sector with coming of automated, sensitive, targeted medicines and technologies having diagnostic, prophylactic and therapeutic effects. Nanomedicines also attained wide acclamation in their initial years, but the transformation from being the proof of concept to successfully marketed products seems very daunting. Although the reason for this may be attributed to slow but incremental character of many present-day technologies, the review asserts that there are other significant facets that may purvey a thorough explanation of this scenario. The article elaborately discusses the hurdles hindering clinical translation of nanomedicines including scale-up challenges, in vitro in vivo cascade of toxicology assays, along with unrefined manufacturing guidelines, inadequate regulatory approvals, competitive conventional market, etc., leading to hesitant investments by pharmaceutical giants. The paper also explores the economic viability of nanobiotechnology sector through an empirical investigation of the revenue data of various pharmaceutical industries manufacturing nano-based drugs, which indicates minor commercial importance of these medicines. We also laid down a comprehensive set of recommendations to smoothen the translational pathway of nanomedicines from an idea to reality, efface the consumer distrust and push boundaries for development and launching of safe, efficient and commercially successful products. Graphical abstract.

Indexed as

Clinical translationNanobiotechnologyNanomedicinesNanopharmaceuticals

Identifiers

PMID32983280
PMCPMC7502307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.