Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32983070›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2020

Secondary Effects of Antibiotics on Microbial Biofilms.

Anahit Penesyan, Ian T Paulsen, Michael R Gillings, Staffan Kjelleberg, Michael J Manefield

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Nanomaterials: A Prospective Strategy for Biofilm-FormingInternational journal of nanomedicine · 2025
    Review
  12. The Use of Long-term Antibiotics for Suppression of Bacterial Infections.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Anahit PenesyanSchool of Chemical Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Ian T PaulsenDepartment of Molecular Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Michael R GillingsARC Centre of Excellence in Synthetic Biology, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Staffan KjellebergSingapore Centre for Environmental Life Sciences Engineering, Singapore, Singapore.
Michael J ManefieldSchool of Chemical Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
UNSW Sydney · AUARC Centre of Excellence in Synthetic Biology · AUEnvironmental Earth Sciences · AUMacquarie University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biofilms are assemblages of microorganisms attached to each other, or to a surface, and encased in a protective, self-produced matrix. Such associations are now recognized as the predominant microbial growth mode. The physiology of cells in biofilms differs from that of the planktonic cells on which most research has been conducted. Consequently, there are significant gaps in our knowledge of the biofilm lifestyle. Filling this gap is particularly important, given that biofilm cells may respond differently to antibiotics than do planktonic cells of the same species. Understanding the effects of antibiotics on biofilms is of paramount importance for clinical practice due to the increased levels of antibiotic resistance and resistance dissemination in biofilms. From a wider environmental perspective antibiotic exposure can alter the ecology of biofilms in nature, and hence disrupt ecosystems. Biofilm cells display increased resilience toward antibiotics. This resilience is often explained by mechanisms and traits such as decreased antibiotic penetration, metabolically inactive persister cells, and intrinsic resistance by members of the biofilm community. Together, these factors suggest that cells in biofilms are often exposed to subinhibitory concentrations of antimicrobial agents. Here we discuss how cells in biofilms are affected by the presence of antibiotics at subinhibitory concentrations, and the possible ramifications of such secondary effects for healthcare and the environment.

Indexed as

antibiotic resistanceantimicrobialsenvironmental pollutioninfectionsubinhibitory

Identifiers

PMID32983070
PMCPMC7492572
OpenAlexW3082296977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.