Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32983048›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2020

KmerGO: A Tool to Identify Group-Specific Sequences With

Ying Wang, Qi Chen, Chao Deng, Yiluan Zheng, Fengzhu Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A survey of k-mer methods and applications in bioinformatics.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Genes · 2023
    Review
  14. Comparison of k-mer-basedMicrobiome research reports · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ying WangDepartment of Automation, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Qi ChenDepartment of Automation, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Chao DengDepartment of Automation, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Yiluan ZhengDepartment of Automation, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Fengzhu SunQuantitative and Computational Biology Program, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Capturing group-specific sequences between two groups of genomic/metagenomic sequences is critical for the follow-up identifications of singular nucleotide variants (SNVs), gene families, microbial species or other elements associated with each group. A sequence that is present, or rich, in one group, but absent, or scarce, in another group is considered a "group-specific" sequence in our study. We developed a user-friendly tool, KmerGO, to identify group-specific sequences between two groups of genomic/metagenomic long sequences or high-throughput sequencing datasets. Compared with other tools, KmerGO captures group-specific

Indexed as

genomic comparisongroup-specific k-merhigh-throughput sequencing datametagenomic comparisonsequences comparison

Identifiers

PMID32983048
PMCPMC7477287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.