ArticleFrontiers in neurology2020
Investigation of Mechanisms in Bone Conduction Hyperacusis With Third Window Pathologies Based on Model Predictions.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.
- A mechanical lumped-element model of the human middle ear for bone conduction hearing.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Arcuate eminence distance to temporal bone outer table in the middle fossa repair of superior canal dehiscence.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025Article
- Bone conduction stimulation efficiency at coupling locations closer to the cochlea.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Evaluating binaural hearing capabilities in individuals with sensorineural hearing loss through bilateral bone conduction stimulation.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Directional sensitivity of bone conduction stimulation on the otic capsule in a finite element model of the human temporal bone.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Skull Vibration-Induced Nystagmus in Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence: A New Insight into Vestibular Exploration-A Review.Audiology research · 2024Review
- Cochlear Aqueduct Morphology in Superior Canal Dehiscence Syndrome.Audiology research · 2023Article
- Three-dimensional quantification of fibrosis and ossification after cochlear implantation via virtual re-sectioning: Potential implications for residual hearing.Hearing research · 2023Article
- Ankle Audiometry: A Clinical Test for the Enhanced Hearing Sensitivity for Body Sounds in Superior Canal Dehiscence Syndrome.Audiology & neuro-otology · 2023Article
- A bone-conducted Tullio phenomenon-A bridge to understand skull vibration induced nystagmus in superior canal dehiscence.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
- Vibration direction sensitivity of the cochlea with bone conduction stimulation in guinea pigs.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Current Trends, Controversies, and Future Directions in the Evaluation and Management of Superior Canal Dehiscence Syndrome.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Review
- Hearing Through Bone Conduction Headsets.Trends in hearingArticle
- The Effect of Stimulation Position and Ear Canal Occlusion on Perception of Bone Conducted Sound.Trends in hearingArticle
- Spatial Release From Masking With Bilateral Bone Conduction Stimulation at Mastoid for Normal Hearing Subjects.Trends in hearingArticle
- Review of Whole Head Experimental Cochlear Promontory Vibration with Bone Conduction Stimulation and Investigation of Experimental Setup Effects.Trends in hearingReview
- Effects of inner ear abnormalities on middle ear mechanics: Findings from adults with MD and LVAS.Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngologyArticle
- Effect of Hearing Aids on Phonation and Perceived Voice Qualities.Trends in hearingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A lumped element impedance model of the inner ear with sources based on wave propagation in the skull bone was used to investigate the mechanisms of hearing sensitivity changes with semi-circular canal dehiscence (SSCD) and alterations of the size of the vestibular aqueduct. The model was able to replicate clinical and experimental findings reported in the literature. For air conduction, the reduction in cochlear impedance due to a SSCD reduces the intra-cochlear pressure at low frequencies resulting in a reduced hearing sensation. For bone conduction, the reduced impedance in the vestibular side due to the SSCD facilitates volume velocity caused by inner ear fluid inertia, and this effect dominates BC hearing with a third window opening on the vestibular side. The SSCD effect is generally greater for BC than for AC. Moreover, the effect increases with increased area of the dehiscence, but areas more than the cross section area of the semi-circular canal itself leads to small alterations. The model-predicted air-bone gap for a SSCD of 1 mm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.