Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32982802›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2020

No Association Between T-peak to T-end Interval on the Resting ECG and Long-Term Incidence of Ventricular Arrhythmias Triggering ICD Interventions.

Peter Michalek, Sasha Benjamin Hatahet, Martin Svetlosak, Peter Margitfalvi, Iveta Waczulikova, Sebastian Trnovec, Allan Böhm, Ondrej Benacka, Robert Hatala

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Steep repolarization time gradients in pig hearts cause distinct changes in composite electrocardiographic T-wave parameters.Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Optimizing ECG lead selection for detection of prolongation of ventricular repolarization as measured by the Tpeak-end interval.Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Peter MichalekFaculty of Medicine, Comenius University in Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Sasha Benjamin HatahetFaculty of Medicine, Slovak Medical University in Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Martin SvetlosakDepartment of Arrhythmias and Cardiac Pacing, The National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Peter MargitfalviDepartment of Arrhythmias and Cardiac Pacing, The National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Iveta WaczulikovaFaculty of Mathematics, Physics and Informatics, Comenius University in Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Sebastian TrnovecFaculty of Medicine, Comenius University in Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Allan BöhmFaculty of Medicine, Slovak Medical University in Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Ondrej BenackaFaculty of Medicine, Comenius University in Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Robert HatalaFaculty of Medicine, Slovak Medical University in Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Comenius University Bratislava · SKNational Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases · SKSlovak Medical University · SK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesPotential of using the T-peak to T-end (TpTe) interval as an electrocardiographic parameter reflecting the transmural dispersion of ventricular repolarization (TDR) to identify patients (pts.) with higher risk of malignant ventricular arrhythmias (MVA) for better selection of candidates for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) in primary prevention (PP) of sudden cardiac death (SCD) remains controversial. The primary objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between the TpTe interval in patient's preimplantation resting 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) and the incidence of MVA resulting in appropriate ICD intervention (AI). The secondary objective was to assess its relationship to overall mortality.

methodsA total of 243 consecutive pts. with severe left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction after myocardial infarction (MI) with a single-chamber ICD for PP of SCD from one implantation center were included. Excluded were all pts. with any other disease that could interfere with the indication of ICD implantation. Primarily investigated intervals were measured manually in accordance with accepted methodology. Data on ICD interventions were acquired from device interrogation during regular outpatient visits. Survival data were collected from the databases of health insurance and regulatory authorities.

resultsWe did not find a significant relationship between the duration of the TpTe interval and the incidence of MVA (71.5 ms in pts. with MVA vs. 70 ms in pts. without MVA;

conclusionThis study suggests no significant association of overall or MVA-free survival with ECG parameters reflecting TDR (TpTe, TpTec) in patients with systolic dysfunction after MI and ICD implanted for primary prevention.

Indexed as

electrocardiographyprimary prevention of sudden cardiac deathT-peak to T-endtransmural dispersion of ventricular repolarizationventricular tachyarrhythmia

Identifiers

PMID32982802
PMCPMC7488192
OpenAlexW3081773192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.