ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2020
Optimizing BCPNN Learning Rule for Memory Access.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Comprehensive Disproportionality Analysis of Drug-Related Head Injury Reports Using the FAERS Database.Brain and behavior · 2026Article
- Mapping the BCPNN Learning Rule to a Memristor Model.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Simulation of large scale biologically plausible spiking neural networks, e.g., Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), usually requires high-performance supercomputers with dedicated accelerators, such as GPUs, FPGAs, or even Application-Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs). Almost all of these computers are based on the von Neumann architecture that separates storage and computation. In all these solutions, memory access is the dominant cost even for highly customized computation and memory architecture, such as ASICs. In this paper, we propose an optimization technique that can make the BCPNN simulation memory access friendly by avoiding a dual-access pattern. The BCPNN synaptic traces and weights are organized as matrices accessed both row-wise and column-wise. Accessing data stored in DRAM with a dual-access pattern is extremely expensive. A post-synaptic history buffer and an approximation function thus are introduced to eliminate the troublesome column update. The error analysis combining theoretical analysis and experiments suggests that the probability of introducing intolerable errors by such optimization can be bounded to a very small number, which makes it almost negligible. Derivation and validation of such a bound is the core contribution of this paper. Experiments on a GPU platform shows that compared to the previously reported baseline simulation strategy, the proposed optimization technique reduces the storage requirement by 33%, the global memory access demand by more than 27% and DRAM access rate by more than 5%; the latency of updating synaptic traces decreases by roughly 50%. Compared with the other similar optimization technique reported in the literature, our method clearly shows considerably better results. Although the BCPNN is used as the targeted neural network model, the proposed optimization method can be applied to other artificial neural network models based on a Hebbian learning rule.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.