Article in Community, work & family, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literature
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Soomi LeeSchool of Aging Studies, University of South Florida.
Katie M LawsonDepartment of Psychological Science, Ball State University.
Sarah DamaskeSchool of Labor and Employment Relations, Pennsylvania State University.
Ball State University · USPennsylvania State University · USUniversity of South Florida · US
Funding
Workplace Policies and Practices Coordinating CenterU01HD051276 · NICHD · RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE · PI KARUNTZOS, GEORGIA TRYPHON · 2005 to 2013
$10.4M
The Population Research Institute: Development CoreP2CHD041025 · NICHD · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI Sarah Damaske · 2016 to 2026
$9.0M
Family Responsive Workplaces &Low-Wage Employee HealthU01AG027669 · NIA · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI BERKMAN, LISA F · 2005 to 2012
$7.5M
Flexible Work and Well-Being Center at the University of MinnesotaU01HD051256 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI KELLY, ERIN L. · 2005 to 2013
$6.7M
Work , Stress, Health &Parenting Among Hotel EmployeesU01HD051217 · NICHD · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY-UNIV PARK · PI ALMEIDA, DAVID M. · 2005 to 2013
$5.7M
Center for Work-Family Stress, Safety & Health: Portland State University RUU01HD059773 · NICHD · PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HAMMER, LESLIE · 2008 to 2012
$4.5M
Health Consequences of Workplace Policies/Practices-CCU01HD051218 · NICHD · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI HANSON, GINGER C. · 2005 to 2013
$3.0M
Evaluating cardiometabolic and sleep health benefits of a workplace interventionR01HL107240 · NHLBI · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI BUXTON, ORFEU M · 2011 to 2014
This study examined whether one partner's additional resources obtained from a workplace intervention influence the other partner's perception of having those resources at home (
Indexed as
crossoverfamily time adequacyperceived stressschedule controlworkplace interventionwork schedule flexibility for family roles
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Crossover of Resources and Well-Being within Employee-Partner Dyads: Through Increased Schedule Control. · full record | OpenQuestion