ReviewLe praticien en anesthesie reanimation2020
[Communication with patients' relatives in intensive care].
Review in Le praticien en anesthesie reanimation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The place of relatives of our patients is the deepest change in intensive care units in 20 years. Working on collegial discussions and recognizing the voices of patients and their loved ones in care projects have become a mandatory part of our daily work. This change is also related to the attention and time given to ethical decisions in the daily life of resuscitation. We need to recognize the need for trust in the health care system as well as with medical providers so that the therapeutic relationship can be achieved peacefully. We must therefore organize ourselves to improve reception of the families, place of the team members, regular formal meetings of information with relatives or the representative of our patient. Post-traumatic stress is not only a prerogative of our patients, it is also described in accompanying people. If trust is acquired few conflicts are challenging, only interfamily conflicts force medical team to defend its opinion. The realization that a specific care project after intensive care is more likely to succeed when it is done with the support of the entourage makes possible to understand the importance to take care to the stress of the relatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.