Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32982543›Full record

ReviewLe praticien en anesthesie reanimation2020

[Communication with patients' relatives in intensive care].

Bernard Vigué, François Radiguer

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Le praticien en anesthesie reanimation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Bernard ViguéDépartement d'anesthésie réanimation, CHU de Bicêtre, 94275 Le-Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.
François RadiguerDépartement d'anesthésie réanimation, CHU de Bicêtre, 94275 Le-Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The place of relatives of our patients is the deepest change in intensive care units in 20 years. Working on collegial discussions and recognizing the voices of patients and their loved ones in care projects have become a mandatory part of our daily work. This change is also related to the attention and time given to ethical decisions in the daily life of resuscitation. We need to recognize the need for trust in the health care system as well as with medical providers so that the therapeutic relationship can be achieved peacefully. We must therefore organize ourselves to improve reception of the families, place of the team members, regular formal meetings of information with relatives or the representative of our patient. Post-traumatic stress is not only a prerogative of our patients, it is also described in accompanying people. If trust is acquired few conflicts are challenging, only interfamily conflicts force medical team to defend its opinion. The realization that a specific care project after intensive care is more likely to succeed when it is done with the support of the entourage makes possible to understand the importance to take care to the stress of the relatives.

Indexed as

Care projectFamily conflictsIntensive care unitPost traumatic stress syndromeRelatives

Identifiers

PMID32982543
PMCPMC7508493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.