Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32982339›Full record

ArticleClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR2020

OUD Care Service Improvement with Prolonged-release Buprenorphine in Prisons: Cost Estimation Analysis.

Nat Wright, Jake Hard, Colin Fearns, Mark Gilman, Richard Littlewood, Rachael Clegg, Luxman Parimelalagan, Farrukh Alam

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Nat WrightSpectrum Community Health CIC, Wakefield, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3547-3724
Jake HardRoyal College of General Practitioners, London, UK.
Colin FearnsDelphi Medical, Lancashire, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2399-8067
Mark GilmanDiscovering Health, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1609-8378
Richard Littlewoodapplied strategic, London, UK.
Rachael CleggChange Grow Live, Brighton, UK.
Luxman ParimelalaganDelphi Medical, Lancashire, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5156-4995
Farrukh AlamCentral & North West London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Aptiv (United Kingdom) · GBCentral and North West London NHS Foundation Trust · GBInternational Institute for Strategic Studies · GBManchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBRoyal College of General Practitioners · GBSpectrum Community Health CIC · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn prisons in England, integrated treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD) is accessible and effective, commonly based on daily supervised consumption of methadone. Treatment limitations (inadequate dosing, nonengagement with care, stigma, diversion and bullying) are noted. Flexible dose, injectable prolonged-release buprenorphine (PRB) which removes the need for daily dispensing and supervision is suggested for prisoner care. This work aimed to predict the difference in costs of current standard of care vs partial introduction of PRB.

methodsA predictive model of compared costs for the provision of OUD care in the prison setting in England evaluated current standard of care (all receive methadone) with a future situation of 30% of prisoners electing to use a monthly dose of PRB. Evidence describing costs to deliver OUD care for 150 prisoners (pharmacotherapy, direct service, indirect health care, indirect security costs) were collected, including assumptions describing how care would be delivered. Evidence sources include national data sources, scientific literature and from experience in the prison health care setting.

resultsFor a representative standard prison population requiring OUD care of 150 prisoners in England PRB introduction is associated with a predicted reduction in direct and indirect costs of OUD care. Annual OUD care costs for current standard of care were £0.6M; with 30% PRB costs reduced by £8665, more than 3000 hours of staff time is saved. Sensitivity analyses showed greater adoption of PRB resulted in further cost reduction.

conclusionPRB can address limitations of OUD care in prisons and improve outcomes. Introduction does not increase cost of care in this predictive analysis. PRB may lead the transformation of prisoner OUD care.

Indexed as

opioid use disorderpharmacotherapyprisonersprolonged-release buprenorphine

Identifiers

PMID32982339
PMCPMC7490057
OpenAlexW3084020280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.